of course, you're right. I should tell them all to leave, and to leave the union in the hands of right-wingers who make shitty deals.
Or at least to try not to give your union a bad name.
of course, you're right. I should tell them all to leave, and to leave the union in the hands of right-wingers who make shitty deals.
meaning?
They were fucking hopeless when they were the AEEU or EETPU or whatever they used to be called as well.
In the ten years that I was a member and paying subs I didn't see any direct action what-so-ever or one rep walk onto a construction site to justify their existence.
I'm talking of my experience of the union, yes, and not the ultra militant wings that you seem to be aware of.
They have quite a few sectors in now, not just the Engineers, but I know a couple of retired reps from the construction sector who were excellent workplace activists.
What has any of that got to do with writing off the whole of Amicus as scabs?
I've no doubt you've got plenty of bad experiences of Amicus. I know many many people have bad experiences with my union, GMB, and let's not even mention the bureaucracy of UNISON. But you can't just write them all off as 'scab unions'.
Hyperbole like that undermines genuine grievances which people like you have with those unions.
Your having one good experience with them hardly contradicts the fact that some people haven't, does it? Lots of people praises the PCS, but....
I've no doubt you've got plenty of bad experiences of Amicus. I know many many people have bad experiences with my union, GMB, and let's not even mention the bureaucracy of UNISON. But you can't just write them all off as 'scab unions'.
Hyperbole like that undermines genuine grievances which people like you have with those unions.
there is a rather large difference between being a shit union (which we might well agree the amicus section of unite is, unlike the t&g section) and it being a scab union (which the old eetpu undoubtedly was)
Aye, best to keep the left-wingers in power, so we can have shitty deals with a radical gloss.of course, you're right. I should tell them all to leave, and to leave the union in the hands of right-wingers who make shitty deals.
Aye, best to keep the left-wingers in power, so we can have shitty deals with a radical gloss.
Hicks definitely looks the best candidate.
And this is different to the union left how?christ, the stupidity of anarchists.
yeah, lets keep the right in power so they can shit over everything before it even starts, and sell out every deal there is.
Voting in union elections is not "fighting" for anything.you keep your nice revolutionary purity, and keep living off the backs of people who actually fight.
And this is different to the union left how?
Voting in union elections is not "fighting" for anything.
you're so tediously predictable. No it aint, but the organisation required to fight a campaign for the GS will be made up of those who actually organise, promote, and recruit to the union, and can make a vital difference to the support people actually get.
Just heard this morning rumours that Kevin Coyne, current North West Regional Secretary and Gill George herself are also standing.
Derek Simpson may be on the way out, and people are talking about Lawrence Fairclough as the favourite, as he will most likely be the gazette candidate. Meanwhile T&G are talking of the merger itself as being threatened.
Im not sure what I make of all this, and what difference it will make all the same.
Voting in union elections is not "fighting" for anything.
Maybe Jerry is just on a credibility building exercise this time around? It wouldn't do any harm on his political CV.
That's what i meant, it might help him build his base in Lockleaze for next year.he might well be too old to stand again in Unite (unless he wants to look a bit hypocritical for going on past 65 as well! Or is he younger than he looks?). It would help him a little with standing for Respect again somewhere tho I supposel
Has KC just become the NW Sec? I thought he was still the Health bod. Him and George standing would probably be a good thing for Simpson, splitting the opposition nicely.
And yet somehow, I'm the predictable one. Got any more cliches for me?sitting on the sidelines...anarchist purity, sneering...thousands of working men and women...
Have you ever heard the phrase "arse about face"?If you think the leadership has no influence on those unions combativity, then you know sweet fa (eg the evil sell out bastard of the RMT turning up to represent Andy Littlechild earlier this week – you think someone like Simpson would have done the same?)