Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

America's New Air Force

The two newest toys the USAF has just had Lockheed Martin/Boeing build (JSF and F-22) are supposedly the last human piloted combat fast jets it'll have - the next generation will be UAVs cos they can build planes that can turn harder than humans can survive.

Maybe that's how aliens manage interstellar travel, and get UFOs here...
 
I'll see your blackbird and raise you a Valkyrie

764px-North_American_XB-70_above_runway_ECN-792.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XB-70_Valkyrie

I think your best bomber is still the Vulcan:

500-avro_vulcan_XH558_takeoff.jpg
 
If the goal in that region is to deny Al Queda the capacity to reorganise and flourish - which it is - this drone technology kind of makes you wonder what NATO is doing with 60,000 troops on the ground when a couple of dozen geeks can achieve the same with games consoles.
 
If the goal in that region is to deny Al Queda the capacity to reorganise and flourish - which it is - this drone technology kind of makes you wonder what NATO is doing with 60,000 troops on the ground when a couple of dozen geeks can achieve the same with games consoles.

They're still dependant on intelligence on the ground, which has been seriously deficient in that area of the world. At least one of the times that a wedding was bombed it was traced back to a personal grudge on the part of a local operative that providing them with info. If they'd had better intelligence that might not have happened.
 
I think the failure there is in large part due to bad information from ground operatives. They don't have anyone who speaks the language and those that do, they don't trust.

No, it's more of a lack of knowledge of local customs and not checking things out properly before it gets blown up.
 
They're still dependant on intelligence on the ground, which has been seriously deficient in that area of the world. At least one of the times that a wedding was bombed it was traced back to a personal grudge on the part of a local operative with a grudge against that group. If they'd had better intelligence that might not have happened.

The last group of civilians that blown up were loading cucumbers into their vehicle. That's how farmers do it over there - travel at night. All it would have taken was a little be of knowledge and some better binoculars.


Never mind me, it's hot and I should be starting dinner.

erm - pretty planes!!!!
 
You have been in that country for how long now and still have no one who speaks the language?

You don't have a single Afghan-American that would be able to help you out???

Come on, now.

The military has a few of them, but I'm certain they wouldn't trust anyone with that background. It's not right, but it is what it is. The source of the problem is on the ground, not in the air (and it sounds like you agree with me.)
 
They're still dependant on intelligence on the ground, which has been seriously deficient in that area of the world. At least one of the times that a wedding was bombed it was traced back to a personal grudge on the part of a local operative that providing them with info. If they'd had better intelligence that might not have happened.
You don't think 60,00 troops acts as a counter force to human Intel gathering?

I guess we differ on that.
 
"New Aeroplane Can Siphon Billions Out Of Public Purse To Private Contractors Faster Than Ever Before, Analysts Say"

The thing about the defense business it that it is a business. Are you a fucking commie? We've no right to cry when getting servicemen dead from the weapons we built:mad:

(although in recent years they have relied on cheap and WORKING copies done by the chinese or ex-soviet stock sold off by the back door)
 
You don't think 60,00 troops acts as a counter force to human Intel gathering?

I guess we differ on that.

I'm not certain what you mean by this^.

Are you saying that having 60,000 troops on the ground interferes with intelligence gathering or that you don't need covert operators in an area with 60,000 troops?
 
"New Aeroplane Can Siphon Billions Out Of Public Purse To Private Contractors Faster Than Ever Before, Analysts Say"

Actually you'll find that they are a far cheaper and more cost effective weapon than manned jets. You can blow up way more weddings, shelters and 'Taliban' per million than with manned CAS. More bang for ya buck.
 
Are you saying that having 60,000 troops on the ground interferes with intelligence gathering or that you don't need covert operators in an area with 60,000 troops?
I don't see that it can help, it just racks up the hostility and makes co-operation harder to come by. It's obviously also important to distinguish between Taliban opposed to a western presence and Al Queda who have another agenda.
 
The military has a few of them, but I'm certain they wouldn't trust anyone with that background. It's not right, but it is what it is. The source of the problem is on the ground, not in the air (and it sounds like you agree with me.)

Yes, the cucumber incident took place on the ground. As for the air, I seem to remember our first four deaths were caused by Americans dropping bombs on the Canadians.

Ground or air, you are only as good as your intelligence. If you can't trust you ground crews to give the right information to your air force, then this will keep happening.

Not that anyone really cares, right? What's a few more dead Afghans - they can't speak your language and if they did, they couldn't be trusted.



No, I'm very much against a weapon that can kill from that distance.
 
Canada has set up many programs in Afghanistan and other nations are starting to adopt them. None of these successes would have been possible without the support of the US military.
 
I don't see that it can help, it just racks up the hostility and makes co-operation harder to come by. It's obviously also important to distinguish between Taliban opposed to a western presence and Al Queda who have another agenda.

The latest reports are that the Taliban are becoming splinter groups and have started acting on their own initiatives.

Did you ever see that Taliban training manual? Very specific on what to do and how to do it. I'm sure that they are all following their manuals religiously, but seem to have different ways of operating.

Canada is lucky. Our Taliban groups are not as hard core as those in the British areas.
 
The latest reports are that the Taliban are becoming splinter groups and have started acting on their own initiatives.

Did you ever see that Taliban training manual? Very specific on what to do and how to do it. I'm sure that they are all following their manuals religiously, but seem to have different ways of operating.

Canada is lucky. Our Taliban groups are not as hard core as those in the British areas.

The idea that they were some tight conventional army beforehand isn't really that accurate tbf
 
However, you feel politically about drone aircraft, the technology is amazing. The pilot can live 7,500 miles away and yet be flying a jet so high over a target that it can't be seen from the ground.

Here's a story from 60 Minutes on them:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5245555n&tag=cbsnewsMainColumnArea.3

I found it interesting that they are ordering more of these drones built than manned aircraft. The future of war has changed completely. Some day they'll just hire gamer geeks to fight wars and pilots will be obsolete.

Yup, you're right, they are stunningingly effective. However anyone who uses such asymmetric devices must expect 'full spectrum' response.

They are terrorism and war crimes.

As you know.

Sorry.
 
The two newest toys the USAF has just had Lockheed Martin/Boeing build (JSF and F-22) are supposedly the last human piloted combat fast jets it'll have - the next generation will be UAVs cos they can build planes that can turn harder than humans can survive.

It's what all those superfast sharp tunring UFO's are that people see. Maybe, possibly.
 
The NYT is reporting Blackwater operates drones for the CIA:

WASHINGTON — From a secret division at its North Carolina headquarters, the company formerly known as Blackwater has assumed a role in Washington’s most important counterterrorism program: the use of remotely piloted drones to kill Al Qaeda’s leaders, according to government officials and current and former employees.

The division’s operations are carried out at hidden bases in Pakistan and Afghanistan, where the company’s contractors assemble and load Hellfire missiles and 500-pound laser-guided bombs on remotely piloted Predator aircraft, work previously performed by employees of the Central Intelligence Agency. They also provide security at the covert bases, the officials said.
Only seems right when you think about it, killed by capitalist free enterprise . . .
 
The CIA is big on the concept of "Externalisation" isn't it.

In a few years time, all that will be left of the CIA is a giant evil brain at the heart of some vast imprentrable pyramid, with a giant eye-ball at the top giving everyone the evils while mercenary corporations, third world governments and things like the NED run around obeying it's evil commands.

Hmmm, Conspiracinessy. They truly are Americas Institute thereof.:hmm:
 
Back
Top Bottom