people can be stupid...that place is a good example,
im banned from oink! as it goes...![]()
Oink is dead as a dodo

people can be stupid...that place is a good example,
im banned from oink! as it goes...![]()

that's hardly the issue, the fact is that if i can get away with not paying for something I ain't paying for it, i'll start caring when musicians and record labels start campaigns for the plight of undertipped waitors and the unemployed.
And if these people are artists like they claim then they should be happy just to have their 'art, out there getting an audience.


or only finding it with a shitty bitrate
Maybe that's because they're shit?And as a communist I don't give a fuck about people getting paid for creating music, i've also got loads of mates in bands who've never been able to make a living off their music and who still do it.
Maybe that's because they're shit?
Still, I'm enjoying the way you've managed to twist your politics around to justify you giving fuck all back to those people who have made personal sacrifices, put in their own $$$ and hard work to create something that gives you personal enjoyment.
Fuck 'em all eh? You'll just consume their hard work and they can whistle for any kind of reward.
Is that what's communism is all about then?
Neither does it give people like you the right to steal their hard work from them.Just cos you are in a band and make music doesn' mean you should be guaranteed a living off it.
So all musicians are bourgeois, yes?anyway Editor it's not suprising to see you sticking up for the poor petite bourgeois artisan.
Neither does it give people like you the right to steal their hard work from them.
But hey! Why should you have to pay to enter their gigs anyway, yes?anyway any of the bands or artists i actually really like don't give a fuck about file sharing other than supporting it.
So you believe that the creator of an art work/song/painting has no rights over it at all and any spotty Herbert can just walk in their house and help themselves to it, if so inclined?The stealing you talk about is simply bourgeois property rights which is theft in itself.
So all musicians are bourgeois, yes?
Are you sure you want to continue along this path of debate because you're on a crash course to make an arse of yourself.
So you believe that the creator of an art work/song/painting has no rights over it at all and any spotty Herbert can just walk in their house and help themselves to it, if so inclined?


But hey! Why should you have to pay to enter their gigs anyway, yes?

So let's get it straight: you believe that musicians should give you all their music for free forever and you give them fuck all in return.What file sharing service do you use???
i had to laugh
So let's get it straight: you believe that musicians should give you all their music for free forever and you give them fuck all in return.
Have I got that right?
But denying musicians a reward for the fruits of their labour is jus' dandy in your book, because you can justify it politically to yourself, despite the musicians being shafted by your selfish actions.No I believe that capitalism is a fucking swindle, that all people should have access to the fruits of human culture whether they can afford to pay for it or not, to deny people such access on the basis of money is an act of theft itself.
zzzz...ultimately talking about filesharing and the like as theft is missing out on the fact it's an act of theft people are forced into by an economic system that is fundamentally criminal.
But denying musicians a reward for the fruits of their labour is jus' dandy in your book, because you can justify it politically to yourself, despite the musicians being shafted by your selfish actions.
It's a cop out.
It's not me desperately trying to bend a political belief to excuse ripping off musicians for my own pleasure, but seeing as you asked, I download quite a few MP3s for listening, and if I like the band, I'll invariably buy the CD.Anyway i'm guessing all the mp3's on your pc have been paid for as needed?
It's not me desperately trying to bend a political belief to excuse ripping off musicians for my own pleasure, but seeing as you asked, I download quite a few MP3s for listening, and if I like the band, I'll invariably buy the CD.
Anyway if you can afford to do it then congratulations, I can't, do you think that because I earn considerably less than you I should have less right to enjoy music?

All this aside...
I still don't get how we ever gonna get to a mindset where the general public will ever value music in the same way again. I could go to HMV.com and find an album for like 2.99 - physical copy, delivered. Likewise I could pick up any number of Sunday papers and find a freebie cd or dvd inside any probably not even bother playing it. They've become almost as worthless as those AOL discs that littered my house for a decade or so.
If plastic discs, with artwork and no copy protection is generally percieved as such low value - then its no wonder people place such low value - if any - on downloads. Its a sorry state for artists and musicians alike really.
When will a digital levy on all isp traffic become apparent as the only way to sustain any digital entertainment via the net I wonder? Or will iTunes/Amazon be enough. I doubt it myself.
"When the productive forces progress to a certain stage, the existing production relations become a fetter to the progress of productive forces; at this point, social revolution inevitably occurs."

"When the productive forces progress to a certain stage, the existing production relations become a fetter to the progress of productive forces; at this point, social revolution inevitably occurs."
Do you think your 'right' to enjoy music extends to ripping off musicians by downloading an unlimited supply of their work for fuck all?...do you think that because I earn considerably less than you I should have less right to enjoy music?