ajdown
Posting in this thread
On the question of hand signals - yes of course she was.
I'm not sure that 'giving the finger' qualifies as legitimate hand signals under the guidelines laid out in the Highway Code...
On the question of hand signals - yes of course she was.
On the question of hand signals - yes of course she was.
Was overtaking another cyclist necessary? If you're in a queue of cars, generally you just have to stay in the queue (and if you overtake, push in, cut up on the inside or otherwise drive like an asshole, you get honked at) so why can't a bike just follow another bike?
Sounds to me like Geri was already in her position in the road when the bus tried to overtake her.


Motorcyclists and cyclists
211
It is often difficult to see motorcyclists and cyclists, especially when they are coming up from behind, coming out of junctions, at roundabouts, overtaking you or filtering through traffic. Always look out for them before you emerge from a junction; they could be approaching faster than you think. When turning right across a line of slow-moving or stationary traffic, look out for cyclists or motorcyclists on the inside of the traffic you are crossing. Be especially careful when turning, and when changing direction or lane. Be sure to check mirrors and blind spots carefully.
212
When passing motorcyclists and cyclists, give them plenty of room (see Rules 162-167). If they look over their shoulder it could mean that they intend to pull out, turn right or change direction. Give them time and space to do so.
213
Motorcyclists and cyclists may suddenly need to avoid uneven road surfaces and obstacles such as drain covers or oily, wet or icy patches on the road. Give them plenty of room and pay particular attention to any sudden change of direction they may have to make.
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTransport/Highwaycode/DG_070314167
DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other road users. For example
* approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road
* where the road narrows
* when approaching a school crossing patrol
* between the kerb and a bus or tram when it is at a stop
* where traffic is queuing at junctions or road works
* when you would force another road user to swerve or slow down
* at a level crossing
* when a road user is indicating right, even if you believe the signal should have been cancelled. Do not take a risk; wait for the signal to be cancelled
* stay behind if you are following a cyclist approaching a roundabout or junction, and you intend to turn left
* when a tram is standing at a kerbside tram stop and there is no clearly marked passing lane for other traffic
Yeah, that's exactly what people are suggesting.
Ah, another thread where a driver was behaving badly has turned into a 'bash the cyclists' thread. What a surprise!
What would you rather have, the cyclist stop suddenly and the bus driver unable to brake in time, potentially injuring or killing said cyclist?

Yup. Some motorists don't seem to think cyclists ever have right of way.No. You should think of yourself as a small car or a motorbike and so should the bus driver. If it was a car performing a three-point turn or other manoeuvre which held him up he wouldn't have behaved that way. Some motorists seem to think that because they usually 'can' overtake cyclists without changing lanes because cyclists are usually cycling in the gutter they should be able to all the time.

In my experience on the road, we often don't get priority when we should.1) She's free to reply if she wants.
2) Why should a cyclist always have priority?

Yup. Some motorists don't seem to think cyclists ever have right of way.
.

You don't have "the right" to cycle in the middle of the road and cause obstructions to other traffic. You should keep as left as you can - as should all road users.

1) She's free to reply if she wants.
2) Why should a cyclist always have priority? It makes sense to me that if you're going to have to potentially undertake a difficult manoeuvre in a potentially unsafe area in heavy traffic, that you would take whatever action is necessary to remove that threat - and dismounting for a few seconds would have been a perfectly acceptable option to me. What would you rather have, the cyclist stop suddenly and the bus driver unable to brake in time, potentially injuring or killing said cyclist?
When the view expressed doesn't match what the Highway Code actually says? I can't ride a bike, but I do know what it says with regards to this!What is it with people round here that seem to equate a differing point of view as 'trolling'?
*shrugs*
One of the things that really annoys me is when in multi lane busy traffic you take the middle of your lane for about 30 seconds (for your own safety), and cars beep you, overtake you and come back in infront of you far too near, or even shout at you. It's like, you being delayed for half a minute, or me being more likely to get into an accident. Fuck off!![]()
I wasn't in the middle of the road - I was in the middle of my lane.
I have to admit I don't have the balls to cross lanes in front of traffic to make a right turn unless the road is empty - if there is traffic behind me, I don't trust them to slow down when I signal, so I stay on the left and wait for the lights to change before shunting my bike across the lanes in front of the stopped traffic.