Pickman's model
sunset spires and twilight woods
7.30pmDerian said:Cheers.. time?
7.30pmDerian said:Cheers.. time?
Hollis said:My collected thoughts on Nana todate are provided below:
"Well I've started it and am enjoying both the 3rd person narrative and subtle interplay of the characters."
"I am also intrigued in Zola's attention to light in describing scenes. I wonder if this is a refection of what was happening in French painting at the time. It will"
"Well, so far my favourite character is that sleezy banker."
"I recommend perservering with Chapter two.. it gets better.. err, yes.."
"This book is great. Zola is so subtle. You think nothings happening.. but then you realise its all happening. More episodic than linear."
Brainaddict said:At last night's bookgroup (which was very enjoyable by the way, despite lots of you losers not turning up) we were discussing the idea of having a 'book of year' as well as a book for each month. This would be a long book of the sort that couldn't be read in one month. Those who aren't interested in reading stupidly long books need not join in, but those of us who like something that takes some commitment and is too long to be read all at once can have this second book in the background that we'll all be reading.
The year is to run between bookgroup anniversaries, and since we've just had one the book we set now will be the book for the next year.
The suggestion that emerged last night was Richard Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy, which is kind of pricey to buy at the moment but is available in various places online, such as here:
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/10800
What do people think of the idea? Worth doing?
Pickman's model said:also, the tenative proposal for the october book is jim mcgregor's 'if nobody speaks of remarkable things' - though that may be revised.
Am I right in thinking that you wouldn't read the kind of book that requires months/years at all? zora said the same thing and I think other people will too, but that's fine. some people liked the idea though so i think it might be worth pursuing.Hollis said:I have no opinion on this at all, except that I won't be reading it.
PieEye said:I can't be arsed with Louis de Bernieres so I'll sit that one out I think.
okay, as an example consider the theatre producer Bordenave, the banker Steiner or the journalist/playwright Fauchery.. they are all fairly major supporting characters but what do you know any of their characters and why they might do the things they do or act they way they act? I couldn't find any clues about what they were thinking.. and i got the impression that they and many (most / all??) of the other people in the book just did as required by Zola to keep the book moving.. but when you get to feel like that you aren't involved and the whole thing seems pointless taken as a whole.Hollis said:I demand specifics.![]()
citydreams said:You're missing out there PieEye...
i think very few of us finished this month's pieeye but we still had a good discussion about it - we'll miss you if you don't comePieEye said:I just don't seem to be finishing any of the books in time at the moment so I'm going to sit out of BG for a bit I think and come back when I think I'll have a chance of completing them in time. It frustrates me when I can't have a proper talk because I don't know the sodding ending.....I've been a useless member these past few months!

Brainaddict said:i think very few of us finished this month's pieeye but we still had a good discussion about it - we'll miss you if you don't come![]()
yes well right now I am questioning his commitment to bookgroupPieEye said:Hollis wouldn't![]()



citydreams said:You're missing out there PieEye.. The War of Don's Nether Parts is a hilarious, farcical account of life within an imaginary South American country. The characters are delightful and exude sexuality, humour and vigour. The plot is extremely finely crafted. There are terrorists, wars, insurgiencies, politics and plentyful liasons that are stitched together in the finest threads of situational comedy.
Without doubt this book is one of the funniest I have ever read, knocking Tom Sharpe well off his perch.

Hollis said:Maybe we should all just agree to question each others commitment to the bookgroup at the moment... Although I'd agree choosing, at the first opportunity, a night on the piss with Jess does seem a particularly feeble excuse for non-attendance.![]()
PieEye said:and Zora can hassle everyone else because she's german and efficient with it.

Orang Utan said:Yes, but it's so, well, obvious - can't we pick books that no one else is likely to have read?
citydreams said:To be more constructive, we thought that chosing two books at a time should allow some more choice within the group.

PieEye said:And I would turn down a night of unbridled lust with Simon Pegg for one on the piss with Jess.
You lot are no contest.

name a few books & let's see if anyone's read them.Orang Utan said:Yes, but it's so, well, obvious - can't we pick books that no one else is likely to have read? The last four books chosen (my suggestion included admittedly) I've read already and had not that much desire to read again.
![]()
I enjoyed it, very well written with engaging characters, but a soupcon of cynical potboiling about it, like his others - you need to read the other books too.citydreams said:No-one else had read it that turned up to the group.
All books are obvious once you have read them.
Did you enjoy it?
To be more constructive, we thought that chosing two books at a time should allow some more choice within the group. Perhaps we should chose one book online and one offline.
could do ernst junger's "storm of steel", an antidote to the arsy pacificism espoused by the bloke who did "all quiet on the western front".Hollis said:military history..
![]()
Pickman's model said:name a few books & let's see if anyone's read them.
also, it does help if you turn up to the bookgroup so you have some small influence on the choice.