Perhaps if you look above you'd see I do have something to contribute.
Besides, Mr Bounty here is trawling around and patrolling the forum of late, checking my posts and then making it his duty to come teach me what's what in Philosophy, which I find... embarrassing... for him...
But hey...
Anyway, I did contribute in both my posts, up there, if only to warn that his notion of Reason is little Johnny's notion of Reason, whereby Reason is reduced to Understanding [
Praxis reduced to
pragma, to "what works"] and therefore it can not be "regionally" representative in any way! It's just a
specific point of view and I let it be known, that's all.
In there, unlike majority of his posts where he is NOT ignoring my posts - quite the opposite is the case [poor little hypocrite!] - he keeps shoving his nose into matters he does not understand but wishes to butt in anyway with ignorance and arrogance. Hence, it was necessary to intervene. I didn't "abuse" him. That he reserved for himself...
You know, for someone who protests how I "lie" about his position, even though I carefully scrutinised what he was mumbling in earlier threads, but to allow himself to "assess" my stance as "socially conservative" etc. because I do not allow his - at best - demi-informed nonsense to go on unchallenged and misrepresent some of us who do know a few things about the stuff he doesn't but wishes to appear very knowledgeable about, as if he speaks for all of the Western word and whatnot - oh, well...
