Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ahmedinajad gets C4's alternative Christmas message slot

The Dalai Lama would have been good, or perhaps John Zerzan...

John Zerzan, lol. Primitivists have to be the biggest cunts on the planet. Their ideology, if it were to ever be put into practice would result in the death of most of the human population, their plans for mass murder/genocide would make the Nazi Holocaust and the Stalinist purges look totally insignificant in comparison. Primitivism has to be the most repugnant and vile of all the ideologies, fascism included.

Though yeah, if we can have Ahmedinajad on the telly, no reason not to have a raving loon like Zerzan on either, just another cunt to have on the telly to take the piss out off.
 
87h98h9jik

The right line to take is really very simple with someone like him, and that is that there's no justification for giving him a moronic thumbs up under any circumstances.

Got that?
 
It's predictable stuff - peace and justice in the name of religion:
If Christ were on earth today, undoubtedly He would stand with the people in opposition to bullying, ill-tempered and expansionist powers.

If Christ were on earth today, undoubtedly He would hoist the banner of justice and love for humanity to oppose warmongers, occupiers, terrorists and bullies the world over.

If Christ were on earth today, undoubtedly He would fight against the tyrannical policies of prevailing global economic and political systems, as He did in His lifetime.
Methinks he has some particular people in mind :D

It's a silly sensationalist thing for CH4 to do, but I find the outrage at him being given a platform a bit odd. So his regime tramples on human rights. It's true. But we see an awful lot of Bush on our televisions. Y'know, the fluffy guy who likes kittens.
 
It's predictable stuff - peace and justice in the name of religion:

Methinks he has some particular people in mind :D

It's a silly sensationalist thing for CH4 to do, but I find the outrage at him being given a platform a bit odd. So his regime tramples on human rights. It's true. But we see an awful lot of Bush on our televisions. Y'know, the fluffy guy who likes kittens.

only if you have the spice channel :(

but we see bush on the news a lot, that's a totally different thing than ch4 giving him an important slot

the thing that is really fucking annoying is that having some militaristic islamic fundamentalist is meant to be an alternative. cos yeah, if there was one aspect of islam that is underrepresented it's the lunatic fringe
 
His point that most of the problems stem from leaders falling away from the 'message' of religon falls a bit flat when you consider that Bush, Blair and Ahmedinajad are all religious nuts.
 
"If Christ were on earth today, undoubtedly He would fight against the tyrannical policies of prevailing global economic and political systems, as He did in His lifetime.

"The solution to today's problems is a return to the call of the divine Prophets. The solution to these crises is to follow the Prophets - they were sent by the Almighty for the good of humanity.
"We believe Jesus Christ will return, together with one of the children of the revered Messenger of Islam and will lead the world to love, brotherhood and justice.

"The responsibility of all followers of Christ and Abrahamic faiths is to prepare the way for the fulfilment of this divine promise and the arrival of that joyful, shining and wonderful age.

"I hope that the collective will of nations will unite in the not too distant future and with the grace of the Almighty Lord, that shining age will come to rule the earth.

"Once again, I congratulate one and all on the anniversary of the birth of Jesus Christ. I pray for the New Year to be a year of happiness, prosperity, peace and brotherhood for humanity. I wish you every success and happiness."
:)
 
His speech kind of makes the people who were screaming blue murder over the choice look a bit silly really.

it's not what he said, it's the a statement putting him on telly

noone cares what he says or gives a fuck. that's another reason it's disgusting. a lot of people do have something to say
 
it's not what he said, it's the a statement putting him on telly

noone cares what he says or gives a fuck. that's another reason it's disgusting. a lot of people do have something to say

Spot on - this isn't an alternative christmas message, if it was they would have chosen someone without the access to the national media or the powerful, someone fighting against oppression, not one of the oppressors. Choosing Ahmedinajad puts it on exactly the same footing as the official one.

It's not like there's a lack of other options too - if they insisted on doing something to with the area they could have chosen someone like Maryam Namzie or another of the many political activists chased out of Iran by the Theocracy under penalty of death and they'd have got some who'd make the argument against both US intervention and the Theocracy. If they wanted to pick some simply to piss off the US (which is the sniggering schoolboy approach i think led to Ahmedinajad being chosen) Moazzam Begg. They could've got someone from human rights watch, medicenes sans frontieres and so on.

Instead they chose the holocaust questioning head of a theocracy that kills people for being gay, locks people up for setting up trade unions or political parties and so on - all so that a group of aging tv execs at a channel whose broadcast content consists almost exclusively of reality tv, property shows, crap teenage soaps with wannabe stars and american trash can pretend to themselves they still run a radical channel. Fucking pathetic.
 
Spot on - this isn't an alternative christmas message, if it was they would have chosen someone without the access to the national media or the powerful, someone fighting against oppression, not one of the oppressors. Choosing Ahmedinajad puts it on exactly the same footing as the official one.

It's not like there's a lack of other options too - if they insisted on doing something to with the area they could have chosen someone like Maryam Namzie or another of the many political activists chased out of Iran by the Theocracy under penalty of death and they'd have got some who'd make the argument against both US intervention and the Theocracy. If they wanted to pick some simply to piss off the US (which is the sniggering schoolboy approach i think led to Ahmedinajad being chosen) Moazzam Begg. They could've got someone from human rights watch, medicenes sans frontieres and so on.

Instead they chose the holocaust questioning head of a theocracy that kills people for being gay, locks people up for setting up trade unions or political parties and so on - all so that a group of aging tv execs at a channel whose broadcast content consists almost exclusively of reality tv, property shows, crap teenage soaps with wannabe stars and american trash can pretend to themselves they still run a radical channel. Fucking pathetic.

Well said - excellent post and am in total agreement with it
 
Worse than that from what I understand. he earned his political capital as an officer with the Basiji during the Iran-Iraq war with special responsibility for training the squads of children they sent in as human minefield clearers on a dodgy promise of martyrdom with a key hung round their necks.
Story here: http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/ahmadinejads-demons
Source? :confused:

Because I read that article you linked to. And it doesn't say what you have implied it says. It doesn't say that he was an officer with special responsibility for training the squads of children they sent in as human minefield clearers on a dodgy promise of martyrdom with a key hung round their necks.

What it actually says is:

from the link provided said:
It was this culture that nurtured Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s worldview. Born outside Tehran in 1956, the son of blacksmith, he trained as a civil engineer, and, during the Iran-Iraq War, he joined the Revolutionary Guards. His biography remains strangely elliptical. Did he play a role in the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy, as some charge? What exactly did he do during the war? These are questions for which we have no definite answers. His presidential website says simply that he was “on active service as a Basij volunteer up to the end of the holy defense [the war against Iraq] and served as a combat engineer in different spheres of duty.”

It does say that children were recruited as volunteers to the Basiji during the Iran-Iraq war.

It does say that those 'volunteers' were sent in as human minefield clearers.

It does say that they were on a promise of martyrdom with a 'key to paradise' strung round their necks.

But it doesn't anywhere say that Ahmedinejad was an officer with the Basiji during the Iran-Iraq war with special responsibility for training the squads of children they sent in as human minefield clearers.

What's your source for that assertion? :confused:
 
Fair cop, I misremembered and didn't re-read when I found the link I'd first read ages ago. I'll re-state it as "he gets some of his political capital from his links to the Basiji, an organisation which trained children to be used as human minefield clearers." You can also read about the role of the Basiji today.
 
Expanding on the idea of "alternative", it's not just that they've wasted an opportunity to have somebody on who could have said something actually alternative to the current system, it's also that they are portraying that as "alternative", and so reinforcing the idea that your choice is between a selection of shitty governments and that's it.

It also reinforces the idea that there really is a "clash of ideas" here, as regularly promoted, that what is actually happening when states are fighting over resources is that there's a Culture War, an Ideological Battle, rather than different tiny groups of people wanting control over the same thing. But, hey, with Channel 4 you have the choice as to how much you align yourself with "the West" or "the Islamic World", so you can be a thoughtful liberal and decide how much of each's rhetoric you agree with to define yourself. It's not like silly old Bush saying "you're either with us or against us"! You can be a percentage with us and a percentage against us!
 
if it was some fucking neo con or some white reactionary cunt doing it the channel 4 and guardian brigade would be in uproar but hey he's the president of a swarthy nation so it's fine that he heads a regime that hangs homosexuals not to mention the rest of it.

Still it is epic trolling by channel 4 pity it does fit with a lot of retarded anti americanism that somehow passes itself off as radical politics these days.
 
"If Christ were on earth today, undoubtedly He would fight against the tyrannical policies of prevailing global economic and political systems, as He did in His lifetime.
Appalling, self-serving drivel, still, he's not American, so it's okay, right kids?
 
Back
Top Bottom