david dissadent
New Member
Yes a paid agent of the Likud\ Zionist ZOG orginisation. How did you spot it?Or, he's a pro-Israeli blogger so unstable that even hardcore neocons have trouble taking him seriously.
Yes a paid agent of the Likud\ Zionist ZOG orginisation. How did you spot it?Or, he's a pro-Israeli blogger so unstable that even hardcore neocons have trouble taking him seriously.
i wouldn't say he's that extreme from reading the wiki stuff tbh, he seems to want to create a space for his views to become talked about and has done that very sucessfully with his blog since 2002 apparently.according to wikipedia, Cole is usually criticised for being anti-Israeli, if anything
i wouldn't say he's that extreme from reading the wiki stuff tbh, he seems to want to create a space for his views to become talked about and has done that very sucessfully with his blog since 2002 apparently.
Or, he's a pro-Israeli blogger so unstable that even hardcore neocons have trouble taking him seriously.
Did you even read the article?Juan Cole said:One of the dangers of the right-wing Zionists' tactic of smearing as "anti-Semitic" all criticism of any Israeli policy is precisely that they end up trivializing this deadly, soul-killing phenomenon, and by crying wolf so often may actually decrease vigilance toward the real thing. Saying that former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert is corrupt, or that Israeli settlers in the West Bank are violating the international law of occupation, is not anti-Semitism. Neither one is doing any favors to Israel or to world Jewry, and it is odd that anyone should defend them or see criticism of them as bigotry. But the bilge that came out of Ahmadinejad's mouth on Friday, that is the real thing.

I like him. He's a mischief maker, like Chavez. Rude Boy Ahmadinejad!
Pretty desperate stuff, and possibly with the intent of getting more hostile rhetoric out of Israel and the West too, ratchet up the appearance of an outside threat.
I don't exactly think many Iranians will be impressed.
The comments on Cole's post are quite interesting about popular reaction to the regime's posturing about Israel/Palestine.
It's not exactly hard to win on a landslide when you're blatantly fiddling the results.I can assure you that you are wrong about that. Was he not just re-elected with a landslide majority?
Well since Cole himself was at the centre of a row where he pointed out that a widely used translation of one of Ahmedinijad's speeches was misleading and made his views look more extreme and anti-semitic than they actually were, that'd be a bit of a strange thing for him to do.As for Cole, his reference to "the usually reasonable New York Times" should tell you all you need to know about where he's coming from. It's the classic manouver of shifting the terms of debate, so that anyone who points out that the USA is blatantly lying about Iran can be accused of being a radical anti-Zionist.
Well since Cole himself was at the centre of a row where he pointed out that a widely used translation of one of Ahmedinijad's speeches was misleading and made his views look more extreme and anti-semitic than they actually were, that'd be a bit of a strange thing for him to do.
Perhaps so, but the fact remains that Juan Cole is clearly not consciously part of any such process, as you appear to suggest in the post I was applying to. It's certainly the case that Cole is willing to criticise Israel's actions, even if his views are somewhat naive.That's what I mean.
Cole did nothing more radical than tell the plain truth about that speech, as any decent journo should have done.
But the Western media have constructed the spectrum of opinion regarding Israel in such a way that simply telling the truth supposedly makes you a fervent anti-Zionist.
The 'So' gives the game away.
So Ahmedinedjad uses anti-semitic language, hardly news. However....
" The occupation of the Palestinian land had no connection with the issue of holocaust. The claim, the pretext, and the masterminds are all fraudulent and corrupt. They are all historical criminals."
......Is absolutely spot on. The Palestinians have indeed been made to pay the price for a European problem that they had nothing to do with. The Israeli state and its apologists do indeed cynically hide behind the holocaust to deflect criticism of what amounts to a modern day holocaust, the ethnic cleansing and cultural genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel.
Give us more bile, less explanation, Butch. I think your standing in these parts would really benefitWeird, i'm called a prick and i'm the one doing the bile. Oh yeah, i described a postion that i think de facto supports a murdering theocracy as 'rotten.'
You need more bile, more wedge driving in all honesty, not sensibe paragraphed defences. More politics.
Which 'people', where? Was this a speech for home consumption?The problem with larding the truth with populist rhetoric is that the truth gets buried by the rhetoric. People won't remember Ahmedinedjad elucidating the lack of connection between the holocaust and the post-war mass-settlement of Palestine, they'll remember the anti-Semitic rhetoric.
You were speaking in general about bile, and so was I. Give me some more, now pleaseIf you need soemthing so simple explaining to you then you also have a problem.
The problem with larding the truth with populist rhetoric is that the truth gets buried by the rhetoric. People won't remember Ahmedinedjad elucidating the lack of connection between the holocaust and the post-war mass-settlement of Palestine, they'll remember the anti-Semitic rhetoric.
You were speaking in general about bile, and so was I. Give me some more, now please