Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ahmadinejad goes off the deep end.

according to wikipedia, Cole is usually criticised for being anti-Israeli, if anything
i wouldn't say he's that extreme from reading the wiki stuff tbh, he seems to want to create a space for his views to become talked about and has done that very sucessfully with his blog since 2002 apparently.
 
i wouldn't say he's that extreme from reading the wiki stuff tbh, he seems to want to create a space for his views to become talked about and has done that very sucessfully with his blog since 2002 apparently.

I'd never heard of him until I read this thread. However, a reading of the wiki article and I wouldn't call him extreme either. I was just pointing out how wide of the mark cocinelle is.
 
Or, he's a pro-Israeli blogger so unstable that even hardcore neocons have trouble taking him seriously.
Juan Cole said:
One of the dangers of the right-wing Zionists' tactic of smearing as "anti-Semitic" all criticism of any Israeli policy is precisely that they end up trivializing this deadly, soul-killing phenomenon, and by crying wolf so often may actually decrease vigilance toward the real thing. Saying that former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert is corrupt, or that Israeli settlers in the West Bank are violating the international law of occupation, is not anti-Semitism. Neither one is doing any favors to Israel or to world Jewry, and it is odd that anyone should defend them or see criticism of them as bigotry. But the bilge that came out of Ahmadinejad's mouth on Friday, that is the real thing.
Did you even read the article? :D
 
Pretty desperate stuff, and possibly with the intent of getting more hostile rhetoric out of Israel and the West too, ratchet up the appearance of an outside threat.

The appearance of an outside threat?

Like the appearance that Iran's enemies have occupied the countries immediately to its east and west, thus surrounding it?

Or the appearance that Israel has been openly threatening to bomb Iran for years?


I don't exactly think many Iranians will be impressed.

I can assure you that you are wrong about that. Was he not just re-elected with a landslide majority?

The comments on Cole's post are quite interesting about popular reaction to the regime's posturing about Israel/Palestine.

As for Cole, his reference to "the usually reasonable New York Times" should tell you all you need to know about where he's coming from. It's the classic manouver of shifting the terms of debate, so that anyone who points out that the USA is blatantly lying about Iran can be accused of being a radical anti-Zionist.
 
I can assure you that you are wrong about that. Was he not just re-elected with a landslide majority?
It's not exactly hard to win on a landslide when you're blatantly fiddling the results.

As for Cole, his reference to "the usually reasonable New York Times" should tell you all you need to know about where he's coming from. It's the classic manouver of shifting the terms of debate, so that anyone who points out that the USA is blatantly lying about Iran can be accused of being a radical anti-Zionist.
Well since Cole himself was at the centre of a row where he pointed out that a widely used translation of one of Ahmedinijad's speeches was misleading and made his views look more extreme and anti-semitic than they actually were, that'd be a bit of a strange thing for him to do.
 
Well since Cole himself was at the centre of a row where he pointed out that a widely used translation of one of Ahmedinijad's speeches was misleading and made his views look more extreme and anti-semitic than they actually were, that'd be a bit of a strange thing for him to do.

That's what I mean.

Cole did nothing more radical than tell the plain truth about that speech, as any decent journo should have done.

But the Western media have constructed the spectrum of opinion regarding Israel in such a way that simply telling the truth supposedly makes you a fervent anti-Zionist.

It is this same spectrum of opinion that makes anyone who says Ahmedinajad won the election fair and square (which he did) look like Osama bin Laden.
 
That's what I mean.

Cole did nothing more radical than tell the plain truth about that speech, as any decent journo should have done.

But the Western media have constructed the spectrum of opinion regarding Israel in such a way that simply telling the truth supposedly makes you a fervent anti-Zionist.
Perhaps so, but the fact remains that Juan Cole is clearly not consciously part of any such process, as you appear to suggest in the post I was applying to. It's certainly the case that Cole is willing to criticise Israel's actions, even if his views are somewhat naive.

And while I'm not suggesting that Ahmadinejad wouldn't have likely won that election anyway, there are some fairly obvious and suspicious irregularities in the way that election was carried out.
 
I remember Juan Cole campaigning against the translation of the speech a couple of years ago which had ahmadenijad "wiping the Jews" off the face of the earth. He thought it an unfair and provocative translation.

He is very hot on translation and no ones fool.
 
juan cole is the guy who criticsed the misleading translations of ahmedinijad's speeches a few years ago. if anyone should be listened to on this subject it's him ffs
 
This is Ahmedinedjad giving it some populist rhetoric to distract from the election fiasco and the ongoing protests. Problem is, it's pretty much a single-use distraction tactic unless your people are thoroughly indoctrinated in anti-Semitism, and the Iranian public, whatever else they are, are well-educated enough to know when someone is running a snow-job on them.
 
So Ahmedinedjad uses anti-semitic language, hardly news. However....

" The occupation of the Palestinian land had no connection with the issue of holocaust. The claim, the pretext, and the masterminds are all fraudulent and corrupt. They are all historical criminals."

......Is absolutely spot on. The Palestinians have indeed been made to pay the price for a European problem that they had nothing to do with. The Israeli state and its apologists do indeed cynically hide behind the holocaust to deflect criticism of what amounts to a modern day holocaust, the ethnic cleansing and cultural genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel.
 
The 'So' gives the game away.

Oh do fuck off you prick. If you wish to join the Zionists in labelling anyone who criticises Israel as Anti-Semitic, go ahead. I stand with the victims of Israeli aggression.
The tragedy is that Ahmedinedjad, with his crass anti-Semitism, plays straight into the hands of Zionist apologists like you.
 
I do so wish to join the zionists. That you think you can subtract the good part from the bad part of a sort of holocuast questioning pep talk tells me all i need to know abaout you and your rotten politics.
 
Weird, i'm called a prick and i'm the one doing the bile. Oh yeah, i described a postion that i think de facto supports a murdering theocracy as 'rotten.'

You need more bile, more wedge driving in all honesty, not sensibe paragraphed defences. More politics.
 
So Ahmedinedjad uses anti-semitic language, hardly news. However....

" The occupation of the Palestinian land had no connection with the issue of holocaust. The claim, the pretext, and the masterminds are all fraudulent and corrupt. They are all historical criminals."

......Is absolutely spot on. The Palestinians have indeed been made to pay the price for a European problem that they had nothing to do with. The Israeli state and its apologists do indeed cynically hide behind the holocaust to deflect criticism of what amounts to a modern day holocaust, the ethnic cleansing and cultural genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel.

The problem with larding the truth with populist rhetoric is that the truth gets buried by the rhetoric. People won't remember Ahmedinedjad elucidating the lack of connection between the holocaust and the post-war mass-settlement of Palestine, they'll remember the anti-Semitic rhetoric.
 
Weird, i'm called a prick and i'm the one doing the bile. Oh yeah, i described a postion that i think de facto supports a murdering theocracy as 'rotten.'

You need more bile, more wedge driving in all honesty, not sensibe paragraphed defences. More politics.
Give us more bile, less explanation, Butch. I think your standing in these parts would really benefit
 
The problem with larding the truth with populist rhetoric is that the truth gets buried by the rhetoric. People won't remember Ahmedinedjad elucidating the lack of connection between the holocaust and the post-war mass-settlement of Palestine, they'll remember the anti-Semitic rhetoric.
Which 'people', where? Was this a speech for home consumption?
 
The problem with larding the truth with populist rhetoric is that the truth gets buried by the rhetoric. People won't remember Ahmedinedjad elucidating the lack of connection between the holocaust and the post-war mass-settlement of Palestine, they'll remember the anti-Semitic rhetoric.

I completely agree and that is the tragedy of Ahmedinedjed's crass anti-Semitism. It gives weapons to Israel and its apologists who wish to smear all opponents of Israel with the brush of anti-Semitism.

This is nothing new, the Israeli propaganda machine is expert at this kind of abuse. Criticism of Israel= anti Semitism. Not difficult, they have enough useful idiots like butchers to do their dirty work for them.
 
Back
Top Bottom