Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Adult book cover designs for kids' books

She wasn't heavily made up. And I don't remember her mother. I only watched it recently too!

It's obviously trying to be eye catching. It's quite a nice photo. It doesn't make me think of CATCF though.
does it have to? As I said, covers often refer to wider issues that are only hinted at by the author or just inferred by the reader/designer/publisher
 
I think anyone who sees something sexual in that picture has been oversensitised to the idea that kids dressed up in any way is somehow inappropriate.

And it is clearly intended to be Veruca Salt

it is but it also looks like she's meant to be one of those child pageant stars, I don't think you can blame people for making that association and everything else we associate w/that (such as early sexualization of young girls)
 
Ok. I think one of the problems is the picture in different people's head of books. I see Verruca Salt (if it is indeed meant to be her) as a fat little girl dressed entirely in purple.

I find it very difficult to accept that there is not an intentional or unintentional Lolita reference in that book cover.

Also, for me the definitive Charlie and the Chocolate factory interpretation is the film with Gene Wilder. I'm not sure why you would stray from that LSD tinged interpretation.
 
Ok. I think one of the problems is the picture in different people's head of books. I see Verruca Salt (if it is indeed meant to be her) as a fat little girl dressed entirely in purple.

I find it very difficult to accept that there is not an intentional or unintentional Lolita reference in that book cover.

Also, for me the definitive Charlie and the Chocolate factory interpretation is the film with Gene Wilder. I'm not sure why you would stray from that LSD tinged interpretation.

the new one with jonny depp added a load of old cobbles about Wonks's dentist father who hated sweets.
 
I'd be concerned about anyone who got turned on looking at it. It's quite different to point at that the sexualisation of little girls seldom leads anywhere good.

Where's the sexualisation? I'm led to believe that little girls and boys enjoy dressing up, there's no flesh on show and nothing provocative about the pose.
 
Just to rewind massively and broaden the topic, the reason why Harry Potter adult covers are ok is because Harry Potter is current, in my view.
 
Actually I think what I'm more bothered about, is that there's a Lolita reference there, and there's no hint of that within the book.

End of.
 
Where's the sexualisation? I'm led to believe that little girls and boys enjoy dressing up, there's no flesh on show and nothing provocative about the pose.
Come on. Dressing up isn't the same as being dolled up like a professional model at the insistence of what an adult wants.
 
Back
Top Bottom