DeadManWalking
Active Member
What about push bikes?
DJWrongspeed said:The Hauser & Wirth Coppermill is always worth a visit on cheshire street. It's pretty surreal going down the road and coming across the most bizarre exhibitions they have in this huge old warehouse.
Well, that's just gone, hasn't it?cesare said:If you think Brick Lane's bad - you should have a look at what they've done to Spitalfields.

oh well i don't go there myself so i can't judge i was just passing on the opinion of someone who has lived there their whole life... i guess maybe the bits that have changed he thinks have changed for the better. if you want the stalls selling odd shoes etc you only have to go up the road to Kingsland Waste market (though i guess that won't exist in not too long).dash_two said:The market has changed quite a lot and is definitely smaller. Just about all the little casual pitches along the pavement at the top heading to the west have gone. You'd see people trying to sell things like a kettle without a lid, or one left shoe. The police drove them away, they didn't like them for some reason.
The pet stalls selling goldfish, budgies and finches along what was Club Row are gone, as are all the stolen watch sellers, who hung around at the junction near the bagel bakery.
The NF and BNP newspaper sellers who had their pitches at the top of Brick Lane are also long gone, but not many will miss them.
Not very surprising they went out of business selling stuff like that, really. Can't imagine there's much demand for lidless kettles or single left shoes.dash_two said:The market has changed quite a lot and is definitely smaller. Just about all the little casual pitches along the pavement at the top heading to the west have gone. You'd see people trying to sell things like a kettle without a lid, or one left shoe.
editor said:Well, that's just gone, hasn't it?
editor said:Well, that's just gone, hasn't it?
![]()

dash_two said:So you're not going to get your hair cut at 'Pimps and Pin-ups' then?![]()
http://www.pimpsandpinups.com/
poster342002: Those little pitches were a mystery. But they didn't go out of business so much as were moved away by the police and council.
cesare said:The whole area just looks like an outpost of Bishopsgate now. The City's swallowing up the East End![]()
Not to mention dodgy porn dvds, smuggled cigarettes, stolen bicycles or a 'fell off a lorry guv' telly. dash_two said:The market has changed quite a lot and is definitely smaller. Just about all the little casual pitches along the pavement at the top heading to the west have gone. You'd see people trying to sell things like a kettle without a lid, or one left shoe. The police drove them away, they didn't like them for some reason.
The pet stalls selling goldfish, budgies and finches along what was Club Row are gone, as are all the stolen watch sellers, who hung around at the junction near the bagel bakery.
The NF and BNP newspaper sellers who had their pitches at the top of Brick Lane are also long gone, but not many will miss them.
marty21 said:interesting area, i worked around there for a few months, about 3 years ago, used to love wandering around the place, i took a picture of that gateway as well, i'll have a rumage around and see if i can find it
Or Brixtoneditor said:It's certainly a great area to wander about though - it's changing very fast yet you'll come across something that looks untouched from Victorian times.
Sadly, it'll probably have its soul sucked out in five years time and end up as bland as Notting Hill.

Nah, Brixton's quite diferent, really.Paulie Tandoori said:Or Brixton![]()
you mean there are differeing grades of gentrification.editor said:Nah, Brixton's quite diferent, really.

I could take time out to explain how the differing demographics, business/housing mixes, histories and economics of both areas have led to them having quite similar but also vastly different prospects, but I really can't be arsed at this last hour.Paulie Tandoori said:So Brixton isn't 'changing very fast' nor will it end up 'probably hav[ing] its soul sucked out in five years time and end up as bland' then? .
editor said:I could take time out to explain how the differing demographics, business/housing mixes, histories and economics of both areas have led to them having quite similar but also vastly different prospects, but I really can't be arsed at this last hour.
I think Brixton's soul sucking danger time was about ten years ago, but the gentrification didn't quite 'stick' and I think it'll be a while before the hipsters start flooding in again. Brick Lane, on the other hand, looks ripe for exploiting, fuelled by its proximity to the City to the west and Canary Wharf to the east.
Brick Lane is most certainly in rapid change - as evidenced by that hideous hipster estate agents - and from visiting the place for decades (I first went there in the late 70s), the recent speed of this transition is positively breathtaking, and I think the local culture will take a hammering as the big bucks roll in.
(Sorry, I went back and edited this post to make it a little less stroppy. It's been a long day!)
)If anywhere is in danger of gentrfication over coming years due to its proximity to the city, i reckon its actually the area to the North, from Haggerston up to Dalston Junction. You can aleady see loads of warehouses and factory buildings being converted to loft-style apartments and luxury flats (see for eg, the hideous mess that's been made of the old Shoreditch library.) And because it doesn't have the historical architechture nor a large settled population in the way that Brick Lane and surroundings does, it will certainly experience some dramatic transformations, especially when the tube extension finally happens. I agree that the there have been equally dramatic changes to the east around Brick Lane, but at least since the 60's, you've had city types/moneyed types in and around here (they were thought to be a driving force in the squatting movement oddly enough).editor said:I could take time out to explain how the differing demographics, business/housing mixes, histories and economics of both areas have led to them having quite similar but also vastly different prospects, but I really can't be arsed at this last hour.
I think Brixton's soul sucking danger time was about ten years ago, but the gentrification didn't quite 'stick' and I think it'll be a while before the hipsters start flooding in again. Brick Lane, on the other hand, looks ripe for exploiting, fuelled by its proximity to the City to the west and Canary Wharf to the east.
Brick Lane is most certainly in rapid change - as evidenced by that hideous hipster estate agents - and from visiting the place for decades (I first went there in the late 70s), the recent speed of this transition is positively breathtaking, and I think the local culture will take a hammering as the big bucks roll in.
(Sorry, I went back and edited this post to make it a little less stroppy. It's been a long day!)
No. I've been back to Brick Lane many times over the years so I've seen the rate of change pretty close up.Paulie Tandoori said:You say the speed of transformation is breathtaking but also that you haven't been there for ~30 years. So maybe it isn't changing quite so fast as you think?
It is:FridgeMagnet said:Slight shoe digression: Pretty sure that is an American import.
Shoe flinging or "shoefiti" is the American and Canadian practice of throwing shoes whose shoelaces have been tied together so that they hang from overhead wires such as power lines or telephone cables. The shoes are tied together by their laces, and the assembly is apparently then thrown at the wires as a sort of bolas. This practice plays a widespread, though mysterious, role in adolescent folklore in the United States. Shoe flinging has also been reported in Australia, Sweden, France and Norway.
Shoe flinging occurs throughout the United States, in rural as well as in urban areas. Usually, the shoes flung at the wires are sneakers; elsewhere, especially in rural areas, many different varieties of shoes, including leather shoes and boots, also are thrown.
A number of sinister explanations have been proposed as to why this is done. Some say that shoes hanging from the wires advertise a local crack house where crack cocaine is used and sold (in which case the shoes are sometimes referred to as "Crack Tennies"). It can also relate to a place where Heroin is sold to symbolize the fact that once you take Heroin you can never 'leave': a reference to the addictive nature of the drug. Others claim that the shoes so thrown commemorate a gang-related murder, or the death of a gang member, or as a way of marking gang turf.[1] A newsletter from the mayor of Los Angeles, California cites fears of many Los Angeles residents that "these shoes indicate sites at which drugs are sold or worse yet, gang turf," and that city and utility employees had launched a program to remove the shoes.[2] These explanations have the ring of urban legend to them, especially since the practice also occurs along relatively remote stretches of rural highways that are unlikely scenes for gang murders or crack houses.
Other, less sinister explanations also have been ventured. Some claim that shoes are flung to commemorate the end of a school year, or a forthcoming marriage as part of a rite of passage. It has been suggested that the custom may have originated with members of the military, who are said to have thrown military boots, often painted orange or some other conspicuous color, at overhead wires as a part of a rite of passage upon completing basic training or on leaving the service. Others claim that the shoes are stolen from other people and tossed over the wires as a sort of bullying, or as a practical joke played on drunkards. Others simply say that shoe flinging is a way to get rid of shoes that are no longer wanted, are uncomfortable, or don't fit. It may also be another manifestation of the human instinct to leave their mark on, and decorate, their surroundings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe_tossing
marty21 said:http://www.bbc.co.uk/threecounties/...04/04/chiltern_shoe_tree_040406_feature.shtml
i drove past this at the weekend, it's close to stokechurch in the chilterns, no idea who started it, what it's for or anything, i've driven past it a few times, never had the time to stop and look and admire it
Sorry, i misread your statement on when you visited & 30 years, etc. Don't know Williamsburg at all so can't really comment on the comparison, tbh. I just can't see that what you referred to as the 'soul' of the place will be sucked out in such a short time, or even over a slightly longer time.editor said:No. I've been back to Brick Lane many times over the years so I've seen the rate of change pretty close up.
It really reminds me of Williamsburg in Brooklyn with its similar mix of run down business/residential buildings, arty types milling about, explosion of smart boho bars/cafes/fashion shops and - crucially - close poximity to the commercial heart of the city.
I like Brick Lane a lot - really - but to my eyes, all the hallmarks of a Williamsburg bland-out are right there in place and accelerating over the horizon.
That's not to say that I think the entire surrounding area is about to gentrify because I don't think that will happen, but I do fear for Brick Lane's future.
What are the 10 photos you have taken that you like the best for whatever reason? I'd be keen to know. Maybe you could post them up somewhere or link to them.editor said:Blimey, the place is gentrifying so fast you can almost feel your accent changing while you stand there.
Here's a few pics:
![]()
![]()
![]()
More: http://www.urban75.org/london/brick-lane-london.html
No, it's stil there but it's a Yuppie market, selling scented soaps and silly cardigans. At least it was last time I was up that way a couple of years ago. I bet some developer has his greedy little eyes on that building.editor said:Well, that's just gone, hasn't it?
![]()