teuchter
je suis teuchter
ETA: Don't forget that that there is also a *minimum* distance between particles.
I don't think this is relevant is it?
There is a minimum distance between integers but still an infinite number of them.
ETA: Don't forget that that there is also a *minimum* distance between particles.
Yes, but the number of particles is bounded, unlike the number of integers.
The point is that there is still an infinite number of numbers between a bounded set of integers
But what if the amount of space you have is not infinite? That's when it matters.I don't see why that matters. Even if you only have two particles, as long as the amount of space you have is infinite, there is an infinite number of distances you can set them apart from each other.
There are an (aleph-one) infinite number of numbers between zero and one. In a similar way, if there was no planck minimum then there would be an infinite number of permutations of particles within a finite space. It is only the presence of a minimum distance between particles that means that the number of permutations is finite in a finite space.I don't think I understand what you're saying here.
But what if the amount of space you have is not infinite? That's when it matters.
Digits. You said you had 9 but forgot about 3.
![]()
I'm saying that this is a possibility, yes. For a start, there are not an infinite number of particles in the universe.
Yes, but the number of particles is bounded, unlike the number of integers.
I forgot about the number 3
Irrelevant. It would be like comparing the same recording on vinyl and a CD and calling them different.
It's easier to compare musical maths than to pictoral ones, as pictoral exists in three dimentions and I guess music only exists in one.
No, that's the point of the discussion I've been having with teuchter. It is far from clear that there are necessarily an infinite number of ways that they could come together.But there is an infinite number of ways they could come together.