Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A postman writes...l

JimW

支那暗杀团
Good inside view from the LRB, puncturing various bits of government and management spin about Royal Mail:
So Peter Mandelson wasn’t referring to them when he went on TV in May to press for the part-privatisation of the Royal Mail, saying that figures were down due to competition from emails and texts.

I spluttered into my tea when I heard him say that. ‘Figures are down.’ We hear that sentence almost every day at work when management are trying to implement some new initiative which involves postal workers like me working longer hours for no extra pay, carrying more weight, having more duties.

It’s the joke at the delivery office. ‘Figures are down,’ we say, and laugh as we pile the fifth or sixth bag of mail onto the scales and write down the weight in the log-book. It’s our daily exercise in fiction-writing...
...
People don’t send so many letters any more, it’s true. But, then again, the average person never did send all that many letters. They sent Christmas cards and birthday cards and postcards. They still do. And bills and bank statements and official letters from the council or the Inland Revenue still arrive by post; plus there’s all the new traffic generated by the internet: books and CDs from Amazon, packages from eBay, DVDs and games from LoveFilm, clothes and gifts and other items purchased at any one of the countless online stores which clutter the internet, bought at any time of the day or night, on a whim, with a credit card.
He also explains how the fiddle is achieved.
Also on creeping privatisation and the killing of any idea of public service:
One thing you probably don’t know, for instance, is that the Royal Mail is already part-privatised. It goes under the euphemism of ‘deregulation’. Deregulation is the result of an EU directive that was meant to be implemented over an extended period to give mail companies time to adjust, but which this government embraced with almost obscene relish, deregulating the UK mail service long before any of its rivals in Europe...
We had a meeting a while back at which all the proposed changes to the business were laid out. Changes in our hours and working practices. Changes to our priorities. Changes that have led to the current chaos. We were told that the emphasis these days should be on the corporate customer. It was what the corporations wanted that mattered. We were effectively being told that quality of service to the average customer was less important than satisfying the requirements of the big businesses.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n18/maya01_.html
 
i do (in parts) understand why the guys are striking etc.

but where i live, it seems they (the local mail office/depot are on strike at least a few days every 6 months, or less even, they strike about breaks, they strike about a guy who was sacked for what was clear gross insubordination.. feck me, they will strike about the wrong type of biscuit soon

so its really hard to empathise with the national strikes which i get are for valid reasons and should be supported. but locally, theres been too much "cry wolf" going on for literally years


although saying all that... they are not striking on these round of action? go figure....
 
Yes, that is a pretty good summarisation of where we stand. Royal Mail make a big deal of a 10% fall in mail volume but those figures have never been validated. What is more, even if true, this doesn't even neccessarily effect the average posties workload much. A 10% fall can be represented by me having 2 or 3 items for some delivery points whereas I might once have had 6 or 7. However, it still takes me just as long to go that delivery point and deliver the fewer letters! What is more, RM accept the number of packets are up. Which means deliveries often take even longer because these packets invariably can't be posted, they require writing out a 'sorry you were out' card etc etc. Yes, we can save some time with inside work but not a significant amount and not the amounts they seem to think can be saved.
 
i do (in parts) understand why the guys are striking etc.

but where i live, it seems they (the local mail office/depot are on strike at least a few days every 6 months, or less even, they strike about breaks, they strike about a guy who was sacked for what was clear gross insubordination.. feck me, they will strike about the wrong type of biscuit soon

so its really hard to empathise with the national strikes which i get are for valid reasons and should be supported. but locally, theres been too much "cry wolf" going on for literally years

...and so much bullshit too. Biscuit anyone?
 
I think there's been a deliberate erosion of working terms and conditions and casualisation of the workforce in order to bring about a self-fulfilling prophecy.

The more they erode terms and conditions for permanent staff, the more will leave and be replaced by casual agency staff who aren't as good at the job.

Then the powers that be complain about slipping standards and how the postal workers aren't as efficient and if they don't buck their ideas up and accept these changed, i.e. worsened working practices then the only long term solution is privatisation...

So of course more of the permanent staff get hacked off with worsening conditions and leave...

Only to be replaced by casual agency staff who aren't as familiar with the job, the routes, so they aren't as efficient...

So management pipe up that the staff aren't efficient and they have to accept new, i.e. worse working practices (or else privatisation is on the horizon), which cause permanent staff to think I've had enough, and they're replaced by casuals...

I think it's a deliberate policy to actually make the service worse so that they can say privatisation is the answer.

It's in the management interests not to improve things but to make them worse, because it's only by sipping off the posties and making things worse that they can achieve their ultimate goal of privatisation.
 
How much does Billy Hayes get paid?

Yeah, that's the key issue, the central one here. Self serving union tops making the most of their postions means that on-the-ground workers who are having their conditions and morale deliberately driven into the ground can go to hell - get rid of Hayes and bring the union tops wages down, that's the priority - the rest can wait.
 
I'd say roughly none whatsoever. And before you say it, I'm not defending Hayes, I just don't think that his being highly paid has any direct bearing on the current attacks on postal workers.

So what people earn is irrelevant to you...Fair enough carry on..
 
I've just applied for a xmas casuals job at our local sorting office...seems to be the only work going round here at the mo. I was actually contemplating trying for a full time job afterwards if i'm successful, but with all this going on, i'm not so sure now. I mean, if everyone was called out on strike a week after me starting there, i'd be screwed. Would i have any legal back-up if i was sacked so soon after starting (probationary period)...i wouldn't not wanna go out...they don't take kindly to scabs in Yorkshire pit villages, if memory serves...
 
TBH I don't get how you read that article, about workers' conditions and the threat to the whole service and even have Hayes' pay cross your mind.
tbaldwin's a simple man, to say the least, as long as he can point out that somebody loosely connected to a dispute is paid lots of money he's quite satisfied that anybody supporting the dispute hates the working class.

I wish I were that easily pleased tbh.
 
tbaldwin's a simple man, to say the least, as long as he can point out that somebody loosely connected to a dispute is paid lots of money he's quite satisfied that anybody supporting the dispute hates the working class.

I wish I were that easily pleased tbh.

Has belboid been running maths classes 2 + 7 = 48
 
Has belboid been running maths classes 2 + 7 = 48
Perhaps you'd care to explain the relevance of Hayes' pay packet to the article in the OP? And while you're at it, could you pop over to the other thread and show me at least one example of a Diana-was-murdered conspiracy theorist who isn't a right-wing loon?
 
I've just applied for a xmas casuals job at our local sorting office...seems to be the only work going round here at the mo. I was actually contemplating trying for a full time job afterwards if i'm successful, but with all this going on, i'm not so sure now. I mean, if everyone was called out on strike a week after me starting there, i'd be screwed. Would i have any legal back-up if i was sacked so soon after starting (probationary period)...i wouldn't not wanna go out...they don't take kindly to scabs in Yorkshire pit villages, if memory serves...

They can sack you for it, my advice would be to join the union, take the strike time off sick, and get the union (CWU) to support you if they take any action against you for going sick, and get the shop stewards advice and support before the strike - their advice should be better than mine.
 
They can sack you for it, my advice would be to join the union, take the strike time off sick, and get the union (CWU) to support you if they take any action against you for going sick, and get the shop stewards advice and support before the strike - their advice should be better than mine.

Noted...cheers :)
 
you might have a point, but not one that is relevant to this strike and the reasons for this strike.

Yeah fair enough. Its probably not that important to this.But overall i do think it has a relevance in every dispute because paying six figure salaries to union bosses is preety shit and divisive.
 
I've just applied for a xmas casuals job at our local sorting office...seems to be the only work going round here at the mo. I was actually contemplating trying for a full time job afterwards if i'm successful, but with all this going on, i'm not so sure now. I mean, if everyone was called out on strike a week after me starting there, i'd be screwed. Would i have any legal back-up if i was sacked so soon after starting (probationary period)...i wouldn't not wanna go out...they don't take kindly to scabs in Yorkshire pit villages, if memory serves...

You can't be sacked for taking part in legitimate industrial action (presuming you're in the union, that is). If you went out with a wildcat strike you'd probably be screwed. This said, depending on local management, they may try and get rid if you take part but they won't give this as the reason. Some managers threatened casual and fixed term contract people with this before the last dispute and ended up being sacked IIRC.
 
You can't be sacked for taking part in legitimate industrial action (presuming you're in the union, that is). If you went out with a wildcat strike you'd probably be screwed. This said, depending on local management, they may try and get rid if you take part but they won't give this as the reason. Some managers threatened casual and fixed term contract people with this before the last dispute and ended up being sacked IIRC.

Hahaha, yeah, i couldn't imagine them being straight up about it for one minute :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom