Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A New Anarchist Organisation

Where do this bunch of praxis stand on the great issues of the day?

  • fox welfare (promotion of)
  • parking meters (smashing of)
  • international brigade of 'anarchists' to join Hezbollah (dreaming of)
  • theoretico-terminological anarcho-criminowotsical praxical guffage (production of)
  • Attica's new magazine (deciding on name for)
 
This is just the local platformist org that's been threatening to be born north of the border for months and months isn't it?. Have you dropped you hostility to verbatim regurgitation of the platform now then attiaca?
 
torres said:
This is just the local platformist org that's been threatening to be born north of the border for months and months isn't it?

It is indeed. The WSM's reverse colonisation scheme continues apace. Really shit name though.
 
The problem with it as a name is that it is a piece of obscure jargon. A great piece of obscure jargon, sure, but still obscure jargon. The vast majority of people they encounter won't know what it means, so they might as well have called themselves something like Veola or Capita.
 
Taxamo Welf said:
tell me about the anarchist splits you can think of...
The DAM/ORA thing is the only one I can think of, but that was a case of a minority leaving, rather than a split proper. Although I think it was experienced as a split in London because that was where the majority of the ORA came from.
 
Below are aims and principles I wrote for up for a potential new group. Was trying to avoid old style anarchist/marxist jargon words as much as I could, which aims and principles of existing groups are often heavily laden with. I'd be grateful for any feedback.
PRAXIS! Doh!:D
 
Nice name.

But...

JHE said:
Where do this bunch of praxis stand on the great issues of the day?

  • fox welfare (promotion of)
  • parking meters (smashing of)
  • international brigade of 'anarchists' to join Hezbollah (dreaming of)
  • theoretico-terminological anarcho-criminowotsical praxical guffage (production of)
  • Attica's new magazine (deciding on name for)

..may have a point.
 
the button said:
The DAM/ORA thing is the only one I can think of, but that was a case of a minority leaving, rather than a split proper. Although I think it was experienced as a split in London because that was where the majority of the ORA came from.
exactly.

Another muppet going 'hur hur people's front of judea hur hur' just cos someone has formed a political group - especially rich from a Communist.
 
Class War split, didn't it?

The most famous anarchist organisation in the world, the CNT, split.

Still, I guess if we're talking about small would-be revolutionary groups in this country, the general pattern is that Leninists split (or expel each other), while anarchist groups just disintegrate.
 
JHE said:
Class War split, didn't it?

The most famous anarchist organisation in the world, the CNT, split.

Still, I guess if we're talking about small would-be revolutionary groups in this country, the general pattern is that Leninists split (or expel each other), while anarchist groups just disintegrate.

Yes, the famous anarchist theorist Woodcock said all this 3 and more decades ago, and the beauty of anarchism is that it constantly regenerates itself throughout history, and not just the last 50 years.

True - Any anarchist group which has been succesful splits in some way and fades away. Those that do not know what the experience of success feels like cannot drop from their HIGH, and therefore do not experience the pressure of trying to build success again, and thus different views of the way forward are the basis of successive splits and disintegration. Certainly that has happenend to CW.
 
JHE said:
Where do this bunch of praxis stand on the great issues of the day?

  • fox welfare (promotion of)
  • parking meters (smashing of)
  • international brigade of 'anarchists' to join Hezbollah (dreaming of)
  • theoretico-terminological anarcho-criminowotsical praxical guffage (production of)
  • Attica's new magazine (deciding on name for)

They are your great issues JHE. Not mine. This is oh so very repetitive, and I would like some real discussion for a change. That appears to be my only dream...
 
Benjamin Frank's book "Rebel Alliances" has a diagram of anarchist group splits/family tree in the back iirc. I've lent my copy to a mate so can't double check.
 
Attica said:
They are your great issues JHE. Not mine. This is oh so very repetitive, and I would like some real discussion for a change. That appears to be my only dream...

Ok. Class War. 'Successful'? How so? By what measure 'succesful'? What did CW achieve?

**I'll probably regret asking, but there you have it :) **
 
Blagsta said:
Benjamin Frank's book "Rebel Alliances" has a diagram of anarchist group splits/family tree in the back iirc. I've lent my copy to a mate so can't double check.

The idea of an anarchist family tree diagram is brilliant, how far does it go back?
 
lightsoutlondon said:
Ok. Class War. 'Successful'? How so? By what measure 'succesful'? What did CW achieve?

**I'll probably regret asking, but there you have it :) **

They put class back on the agenda for a lot of people who thought the liberals the hippies were going to run things on the left forever and ever. That's a good starting point - albiet one that it should not have been needed to make.
 
lightsoutlondon said:
Ok. Class War. 'Successful'? How so? By what measure 'succesful'? What did CW achieve?

**I'll probably regret asking, but there you have it :) **

1. Put Class War anarchism on the map/ in the news. It took anarchism out of the ghetto before and after the poll tax, and people bought Class War from many different newsagents (I should know I was stocking them for a while in Hackney - 200 per issue).

2. Contributed to many different struggles.

3. Developed theory of its own - articles such as "What do we do when the cops fuck off" published after some mid 1980s riots. When dual power was an interesting possibility and when there were real communities of resistance.

There's more too, l8r.
 
JHE said:
Class War split, didn't it?

The most famous anarchist organisation in the world, the CNT, split.

Still, I guess if we're talking about small would-be revolutionary groups in this country, the general pattern is that Leninists split (or expel each other), while anarchist groups just disintegrate.

When I was at University (briefly), the Anarchist Association overspent their budget from the students union and had to disband ....

.... so they were reborn as the Revolutionary Anarchist Club ....

(think acronyms ...)
 
torres said:
This is just the local platformist org that's been threatening to be born north of the border for months and months isn't it?. Have you dropped you hostility to verbatim regurgitation of the platform now then attiaca?

Latest news from a Glasgow meeting - they appear to have a good national spread, and have a 'launch' type meeting on August 4th in Glasgow. And no, they will be doing 'no verbatim regurgitation of the platform' even though some maybe fond of emphasising platformism as a starting point. Their starting point is very good - a critique of the existing poor organisations, and from what I know of the people involved it will be the best organisation in Britain in no time at all.:eek: :D
 
What do you mean by national spread? Have a you a link to this latest news? Are you trying to join? Is it not just for local people in one scottish town any more then?
 
torres said:
What do you mean by national spread? Have a you a link to this latest news? Are you trying to join? Is it not just for local people in one scottish town any more then?

Have you really no imagination? Are you getting organisationally scared?

Here's a titbit for you - they have people in the south, centre and north of England, and Scotland, that I am aware of. There could be more... It is going to be a national organisation...
 
Back
Top Bottom