The_Reverend_M
More bass, vicar?
I'm shocked so many people think they're important!



But that's not even true is it?Dubversion said:The Fratellis? The Kooks?
<snigger>
118118 said:But that's not even true is it?
You may have a point but I've not heard any of those bands you namechecked.ohmyliver said:The paddingtons, Neils Children, The Kooks, rasorlight, the others, the metro riots, The Delta Spirit, etc etc etc etc... have a look at the sort of bands kids aged between 15 and 21 are creating, and you'll see at least a nod to the libertines in the majority of them
Er, who?ohmyliver said:The paddingtons, Neils Children, The Kooks, rasorlight, the others, the metro riots, The Delta Spirit, etc etc etc etc...
ohmyliver said:for the record I like the libertines, but 'most important' isn't really a musical taste thing, its a fact thing. So just because you hate/dislike the libertines, that shouldn't influence your answer to this question.
Bands that have been influenced by the libertines... a legion of indie kids really.... you might hate them all.. but thats *not* the point....
The paddingtons, Neils Children, The Kooks, rasorlight, the others, the metro riots, The Delta Spirit, etc etc etc etc... have a look at the sort of bands kids aged between 15 and 21 are creating, and you'll see at least a nod to the libertines in the majority of them
LD Rudeboy said:Was it just me who thought The Libertines sounded like an English version of The Strokes?![]()
FineDubversion said:1) it's not entirely untrue.
2) it was a gag.
LD Rudeboy said:I like The Strokes.![]()
118118 said:Fine![]()
I downloaded an alan lomx collection form a soulseek "dubversion". Was it you?
Dubversion said:No, i'm entirely capable of distinguishing between importance and like. For example, I loathe the Beatles but i'd never be so fuckwitted as to not entirely recognise their importance.
The Libertines simply aren't very important. Out of the bands you list, i suspect only Razorlight will be around or successful in 3 years time
Iam said:
Dubversion said:and with that really annoying quasi-skank that lots of bands have started using that really gets on my wick
trashpony said:Who?![]()


lightsoutlondon said:Sorry, ohmyliver. You fail on both counts - viz,
1. the number of bands listed doth not make a legion. Or even a legion of part-timers.
2. there's not one band you name which is worth the dirt from the boots of Greg Ginn and Henry Rollins.
I too loath The Beatles. Not one penny of my money has enhanced McCartney's wealth or Lennon's estate. Just like I won't have a TV in my flat, I won't allow a Beatles CD or vinyl across the threshold. Ever.
ohmyliver said:sorry you've just proved my point about being unable to distinquish between 'like' and 'importance'. Did you not read my post? or was the point of your post to suck up to dubversion?
Or go google Greg Ginn and Rollins and get back to me.lightsoutlondon said:I don't 'suck' anyone. Ever.
I've proven your point? Go away, fanboy.Or go google Greg Ginn and Rollins and get back to me.
ohmyliver said:erm.. I'm a trained historian y'know...
lightsoutlondon said:Alrighty!
e2a The Henry Rollins Band? Must have missed that one.
ohmyliver said:ok, the rollins band, or the (henry) rollins band then... whatever

ohmyliver said:Is that not slightly prooving my point vis a vis influence?