I'm well aware of the idea of a double bluff - but given the chronic lack of actual evidence, rather than hearsay to support any of the claims made by the 9/11 truth seekers (who as I've said on numerous occassions would be better off focussing in impeaching Bush on the basis of neglect of duty for which there is a clear line of evidence) and the huge amount of evidence that the Bush administration is wholly and utterly incompetent at anything that doesn't involve Karl Rove's media management skills, I'd like to see some actual evidence of the depth of thinking required for a double bluff being present.