Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

9 Ways Privileged People Can Reduce the Negative Impact of Gentrification

You've just shat all over your own argument. The sort of exclusivity you're talking about...it excludes the majority in an area like this. Economically and socially, which is a great way to be made to feel about the area you've grown up in/spent most of your life in.

Projection again, though it may be true.
 
You've just shat all over your own argument. The sort of exclusivity you're talking about...it excludes the majority in an area like this. Economically and socially, which is a great way to be made to feel about the area you've grown up in/spent most of your life in.

I've lived round these parts all my life. Longer, I'd say, than the majority of the johnny come lately types on here, judging by the comments. Anyway, I'd rather not spend 9 quid on a cocktail any place, and I certainly don't have the money to spend on the bookies, of which there are 3 on the High Street. I note the local community avail themselves of that particular vice well enough.

What you probably do realise, is that this exclusive cobblers works, it's the oldest trick in the book. If you fall for it. Why would locals want to go to some crappy overpriced cocktail bar when there are better places to go to?
As the poster Co-op mentions, it's the landlord who is mostly to blame.
 
Hadn't noticed this was in the brixton forum. That advice then would be better directed at places just starting to come under threat - in bristol we'd be looking at whitehall, eastville...
I fear Whitehall may be lost already.

I'll see what I can do about Eastville
 
I've lived round these parts all my life. Longer, I'd say, than the majority of the johnny come lately types on here, judging by the comments.

At least that's what you'd like to think.

Anyway, I'd rather not spend 9 quid on a cocktail any place, and I certainly don't have the money to spend on the bookies, of which there are 3 on the High Street. I note the local community avail themselves of that particular vice well enough.

That's right. Us council estate scum can't do without putting a few quid on the 3.30 at Newmarket. :facepalm:

What you probably do realise, is that this exclusive cobblers works, it's the oldest trick in the book. If you fall for it. Why would locals want to go to some crappy overpriced cocktail bar when there are better places to go to?
As the poster Co-op mentions, it's the landlord who is mostly to blame.

The problem, which you appear to be unable to see, is that eventually there will be little "old Brixton" left, and that includes the shops etc that make living here bearable for anyone on a low income.
We're being progressively excluded from the area (even by Lambeth Council, who feel that there's "too much" social housing in the borough). That's a physical fact. The exclusivity isn't just about a handful of shops and restaurants, it's about the alteration of the area from a multi-class, multi-ethnic place where everyone tries to rub along, to an increasingly monocultural desert being peopled by the aspirational middle classes, the majority of whom are white.
 
The key factor is the local night businesses getting shut down is noise. It only takes one complaint by cunty and areas change. See soho and work outwards in all directions.

It's not just urban settings either, where this happens. Apparently, my uncle's favourite pub, just outside Norwich, has just lost its' entertainment licence after several people from a newbuild private estate next door had a whine to the licencing committee.
 
At least that's what you'd like to think..

That's what I know, given previous comments on how long people have been in the area. Go speculate and grasp at straws elsewhere.

Yep, folk can waste their money down the bookies (3 in one High St!) or they can waste it in some crappy cocktail bar.
 
That's what I know, given previous comments on how long people have been in the area. Go speculate and grasp at straws elsewhere.

It's "grasp", and I'm not speculating.

Yep, folk can waste their money down the bookies (3 in one High St!) or they can waste it in some crappy cocktail bar.

And we're all grateful for your permission to do so, believe me!

:facepalm:
 
At least that's what you'd like to think.



That's right. Us council estate scum can't do without putting a few quid on the 3.30 at Newmarket. :facepalm:



The problem, which you appear to be unable to see, is that eventually there will be little "old Brixton" left, and that includes the shops etc that make living here bearable for anyone on a low income.
We're being progressively excluded from the area (even by Lambeth Council, who feel that there's "too much" social housing in the borough). That's a physical fact. The exclusivity isn't just about a handful of shops and restaurants, it's about the alteration of the area from a multi-class, multi-ethnic place where everyone tries to rub along, to an increasingly monocultural desert being peopled by the aspirational middle classes, the majority of whom are white.
It's also about the 'practical and day to day living shops' - when I lived in Clapham (no burning torches please : )) there was a lovely Cypriot green grocers, a butchers and the clapham north cobbler (shoe mender-not a loaf or pub) -all demised sadly and replaced by bars for the young interlopers. The 24 hour convenience store opposite the railway has recently closed after competing with Sainsburys local for 11 years; so on and so on. In brixton we have lost shops and will loose more.
 
I'm not presuming. I'm passing on what I hear around me. Admittedly, one is slightly more likely to hear such sentiment if one lives in social housing, but I don't need to presume that people feel the same when they're actually enunciating those sentiments.

It's not what I have heard in this road, which is half social housing.
 
Last edited:
Possibly because it is impossible to stop "gentrification". Money speaks loudest. Local voices get overwhelmed by the sound of the pound.
I know there is a bigger piece we probably can't influence around government policy and London's status as a world financial haven- and that was what they were getting at with their final point about voting- but it just felt like a lot of earnest talking points for liberal guilt.... To Winot's point, what does one actually *do* to mitigate the impact of just being here?
I try and use local businesses*, I try to be a responsible member of the community......But by the virtue of just being who I am I am contributing to gentrification. So what can I actually *do*? Carry on as I am and feel guilty? What use is that to anyone? Is there an actual, concrete do differently?

*where they produce anything I might conceivably want- but even that decision is a function of gentrification.
 
....from this eve's Standard...

Thackeray Estates, run by Brett Palos, stepson of billionaire retailer Philip Green (.....) strategy is to buy up clusters of properties — such as shopping parades with upper parts that can be refurbished into smart flats — with the aim of improving a neighbourhood by building a “village”.

“One thing that grates on us is the inability of successful people, career professionals, to buy a flat in central London. They go to university, become a lawyer or accountant, but still can’t afford it.”


Dover House, a former hotel and restaurant in Waterloo, is its latest project..

“It’s quirky and individual, with an organic food shop, a vintage clothes store and even a moped retailer that sells coffee,”

.....pretty much covers the day-to-day requirements then...
 
There was a thread on here about rich Americans popping round to their neighbours with a tray of cakes, nice. Also they could put their unwanted furniture, clothes, electronics etc outside instead of taking them down the dump, and they could rent out spare rooms at a peppercorn rent to anarcho punk syndicalists
 
Brixton's Junction development featured in the ES today:

http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/bank-brixton-new-flats-first-time-buyers

£200k gets you half a one-bedroom flat.

620-development.jpg


Another developers pic containing only white people..
 
I think it's a very balanced piece. That's why I posted it, but already the same old off-topic guff about 'obsessions' with the are Village being brought up.
No one is saying that here either, but if new businesses are going to claim that they're part of the community or that they are truly accessible to all or that they're somehow continuing a local tradition, it's only right that those claims are examined. I'm not convinced by Wahaca's highly selective approach in this regard, for example, <<snip>>.
The wahaca thing is interesting. They have used a local artist to paint the outside: the lampshades were a commission from another local artist. They are supporting small local businesses (it would be easier and cheaper for them to do what most chains do, and use their usual decorators and suppliers and get bulk discounts).... But I can see how, if your memory is of a fundamentally different Brady's, that is no consolation.
 
Back
Top Bottom