Bob_the_lost
Elsewhere
*puts fingers in ears and humms*
Can't hear you! They must be fuel efficient, that way i can justify one!
4 x 4 vs Sports Cars
- Thread starter terrythomas
- Start date
Can't hear you! They must be fuel efficient, that way i can justify one!
Gixxer1000
cant wheelie a shaftie :(
Had as low as 18 MPG in the X flow (mind you it spat out petrol in the form of flames).
Just get one , running gear is v v cheap. Lots of readily available spares. They arent an every day car though, say hello to bimetalic corrosion if you run over winter. Residuals are very high- I sold both mine for the same price I paid for them.
Just get one , running gear is v v cheap. Lots of readily available spares. They arent an every day car though, say hello to bimetalic corrosion if you run over winter. Residuals are very high- I sold both mine for the same price I paid for them.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Only if there's a 30mph speed limit, if not Cobbles only does about 70mph.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
To be fair though, they're usually heading for the Tesco metro to stock up on cakes and biccies.
Thats not much to boast about- my little 998cc yaris gets 45mpg doing 75 on motorways. AND its far more efficient around town.
Maybe you should get one of them instead if you are really bothered about fuel consumption!
hash tag
Lighting the blue touch paper
Modern cars, Inc SUVs have many more safety features than many older but smaller cars. My old CX3 would jam solid to a halt if it were moving very slowly towards an obstruction like a barrier. Our much smaller 500 does not even have parking sensors front or rear. I think I know which is safer from a pedestrians point of view.
