Well, seing as I'm bored, let's have a look shall we?
Now that's relevant to the OP, and advice I think few people would disagree with. And the response?
tom k&e said:And for the love of god use 2k rather than 98.
Now that's relevant to the OP, and advice I think few people would disagree with. And the response?
Which is both wrong, and insulting, but y'know, I'm a reasonable kind of guy, so my response is...GarfieldLeChat said:for the love of god use xp
ffs you archic muppet use a modern system
Which, as you'll note, still isn't attacking anyone, but garf decided to respond withtom k&e said:2k & xp are fundamentaly very similar, most of the differences are cosmetic. They're windows 5.0 & 5.1 internaly
Which we've established is nonsense. The advice he stop posting here was partly for his own good (seeing as by ignoring it and continuing to dig he's ended up looking a bit silly), and for everyone elses, seeing as it's hardly the first time he's posted utter rubish here, to the potential detriment of the entire community.GarfieldLeChat said:not really the difference is that developement on 2000 stopped a long time ago the developement on xp has not yet stopped ... security wise xp is better as it has been patched 2000 hasn't...

