Spot the difference.
Erm, one of them's joking...
Spot the difference.
And by the way, if they are not children, why did you not say 16-year-old woman?
Interestingly/ worryingly the age of consent in Spain is only 13
i said they were 'young women' which i think is more appropriate than 'children.'
Interestingly/ worryingly the age of consent in Spain is only 13 (according to what I googled anyway)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe
The old school's not quıte dead yet eh?

Spot the difference.
mmm, same for places like Sweden also. It's ridicolous.
The age of consent in Sweden is 15, as specified by the Swedish Penal Code, Chapter 6 (On Sexual Crimes). The age of fifteen is referred to several times, for example in Section 4, which reads: "A person who has sexual intercourse with a child under fifteen years of age or who with such a child carries out another sexual act that, having regard to the nature of the violation and the circumstances in general, is comparable to sexual intercourse, shall be sentenced for rape of a child to imprisonment for at least two and at most six years."
There is a position of trust rule in which the age of consent is raised to 18. The section mentioned above continues:"The same applies to the person who carries out an act referred to in the first paragraph to a child more than fifteen years of age but less than eighteen years of age and who is offspring to the perpetrator or in the perpetrator's care or in a similar relationship to the perpetrator, or for whose care or guardianship the perpetrator is responsible due to the decision of a government agency."
There is also a close in age exception (Chapter 6, Section 14) "...not sentenced if it is obvious that the act is no violation of the child considered the small difference in age between the person who carries out the act and the child and other circumstances." In a verdict of March 30, 2007, the Supreme Court found that a 17 year old boy had not committed a criminal act by having sexual intercourse with a girl 14 years and 7 months old. (Case B 415-07)
Erm, one of them's joking...
16 year olds are children. I feel repulsed.
Thank you Brix.
(((Brix)))
Assuming you did mean me!
Don't be ridiculous; the average 16 year-old is a long way from being a child and more than old enough to be responsible for their own behaviour, as is the average 20 year-old. You'd be hard put to tell the difference between them most of the time.
and which old school would that be?
I dıdn't make the law dıd I? And I wouldn't touch a twelve year-old wıth yours. I lıve on the Mexıcan border though, so I see a good many bad thıngs.
I know. I was joking. That was kind of the point.

Can I just say congratulations Stanley. Talk about light the blue touch paper and retire.![]()
You tell me. St. Trınıan's perhaps?
Thıs one should run and run. As ındeed should Stanley.
So what point were you trying to make then?
I've forgotten to be honest. What was the questıon agaın?
According to this it's 15 in Sweden:
The principle of disregarding the age when the older person is close in age to the younger one is quite a sensible one really.
no they're not. They are young women capable of having sex and making their own decisions on lots of things, IMO.
Dear Daily Mail,
Following Stanley Edward's letter last week regarding escorting 16 year old girls, I feel compelled to reply as I am outraged. There's law and there's morality. They're not the same thing. Does their legality mean they should be sleazed over by someone who is meant to be there to protect them? If he's employed to look after them, isn't he in loco parentis? And if he is in loco parentis then no, it isn't legal, is it??
I'm sure most of them have had sex but, hopefully, with guys their age, not someone three times their age.
Yours Outraged,
milly molly

That's better, I expected more from a green inker to be honest.
see post 29 milly molly. i said they were young women.
Twat.
