 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
#51
31-12-2001, 19:16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
mobymonster 
|
|
#52
31-12-2001, 19:52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hattie,
I'd be happy to carry a bean bag gun, as long as all the wannabe ganstas carry then instead of the real ones....
|
|
#53
01-01-2002, 22:49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Moby and Colin - you've missed the point. The point is that non-killing devices offer alternatives for incapacitating people. I'm not saying the Police don't need conventional guns. I'm saying there are many occasions when something else could be used instead... and lives would be saved.
I am aware that the bean bag gun doesn't always work. It's just an example. I beleive there are other alternatives to guns too. Surely they should at least be looked into. And Colin - Derek Bennett was not a gangster, he was a traffic warden.
|
|
#54
01-01-2002, 22:54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tell that to the bloke he took hostage on the Angel town and held a gun to his head when confronted by police....
Do you think the bloke thought... Oh it's okay, this geezers a traffic warden and that thing he's holding to my head, that looks like a gun, will only mildly scorch my temple if he pulls the trigger.... [ 01 January 2002: Message edited by: ColinTheCopper ]
|
|
#55
01-01-2002, 23:34
|
|||
|
|||
|
It was a particularly realistic fake gun too (handle taped up, fingerprints etc). I'm not saying he neccessarily deserved what he got, but you go around waving a realistic looking weopon anywhere (and particularily an area with a prevalent gun culture like Brixton) and take a hostage...well what do you expect ? What would have happened if it had been a real gun, he had killed the hostage and the police had done nothing to protect that citizen ?
For some reason, I almost feel they'd have been less of an outcry. [ 02 January 2002: Message edited by: J-B ]
|
|
#56
02-01-2002, 08:31
|
|||
|
|||
|
sorry folks I have been away for a bit but please let me explain my much earlier post..
If you are going to go on a march described above then why bring the kids? It seems inapropriate in my opinion to take your children on a do that may well kick off... further i feel that the police are going to feel threatened by such a march and will overreact if any bother occours..Consequently when the march rerouted to brixton police station it is naive in my opinion to expect the police to let you get there without a fight..So if you are going to go for it then perhaps leave the kids at home, get masked and tooled up and do all you can to win...looting in br9ixton town centre is a bit of a waste..and a distraction... Happy new Year to you all..(except Colin...you go fuck yourself you pig cunt..) 
|
|
#57
02-01-2002, 13:06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steelgate
Just to provide a bit of balance, one of the reasons why NIPS/RUC is 90% protestant is that catholic extremists were likely to kill catholic police and intimidate their families, unsurprisingly it made people living in Catholic areas think twice before joining. Mind you the IRA scumbags were pretty non-sectarian in deciding who to murder - around 300 police killed in 30 years.
|
|
#58
05-01-2002, 14:57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, well, well (or should it be hello, hello, hello, what's all this 'ere then?)
We really thought that the MFJ march was going to be hijacked like the last one and end up with loads of shops trashed. We did not attack anyone - we just kept them from going back to the town centre because we did not want any trouble. No windows went in either - well none that were reported to us anyway. On the reason for the march, I deeply, deeply regret that anyone should lose their life. No matter what the circumstances, no one deserves that. OK stun guns might be OK (like if the other guy has a knife) but not when the other guy has a gun. I do not know why Alex lost his job. I know nothing about that. I can understand the real concern and suspicion all this stuff churns up with the police. I try to build confidence and reassurance and this stuff just undermines it all. There are no winners here. If you think its useful me participating OK but if you think I'm invading your space I'll butt out! 
|
|
#59
05-01-2002, 15:43
|
|||
|
|||
That's funny, you would expect an Oxford graduate to have better spelling/ punctuation/ grammar skills and to be more articulate than that.
|
|
#60
05-01-2002, 15:51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lets suppose that you really are a copper, and taking into account that your writing style is a little less jarring than Colin the coppers, and that your attitude to the local populace appears a little less harsh than his, why would you want to be on these boards? You accept that your presence might be unwelcome! And maybe you understand the reasons for that! And yet you still post, so what is it about?
Is this some kind of exercise in "public consultation" ? Are you claiming the time for this as work? Are you responding as a copper or a human being? How do you view this board?Are we some kind of guinea-pigs for you? Perhaps if you answered some of these questions, it would help us to evaluate whether we want to engage with you or not! Quote:
We thought he was ugly, so we kicked him and beat him up! We thought he was a waste of space, so we smashed his head against the cell wall! Its all so handy for coppers at the moment isnt it. They just have to "think" something might happen, and that allows them to pen people in and to deprive them of their rights and liberty for as long as they "think" it is necessary! Well, there was nothing expected for that march! And those who were involved are not likely to have improved their feelings about the police whilst the bully boys strutted their stuff on the pretence that some copper "thought" something might happen. Ihello If you are now into the business of stopping crime before it happens, I guess we can look forward to a copper on every street corner in Brixton, can we. Including all the spots where people are regularly attacked! And where houses are regularly burgled. And where crack is openly sold on the streets! Or is just demonstrators that really concern you at the moment. Are you out to stop crime or just to crush dissent?
|
|
#61
05-01-2002, 23:32
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Fuck you with your pussying around and attempts at nice words. The reason you overreacted is because you know why we hate you, and you know we're right and will win, otherwise why the over reaction to what you already knew was a small demo? Surely not because you're trying to intimidate people away from expressing their feelings? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#62
06-01-2002, 19:12
|
|||
|
|||
Come on Commander.......nothing has driven me more to post this message than the desire to hear your answer to the last two......
|
|
#64
06-01-2002, 19:49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Colin the cop is an imposter from Inverness! See the other thread he was posting on!
|
|
#65
06-01-2002, 20:22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please note that 'Whiskey' is using the same ISP as 'the Commander' and is quite probably Colin the Cop/Blair Peach/Phoenix etc, the useless, trolling lying bullshitter from Inverness.
What's the matter Colin - are you too scared to put your own name and identity to your posts? (Note: ALL IP addresses are logged, time-stamped and traceable and continuing abuse of these boards will result in an official complaint to the ISPs concerned) [ 06 January 2002: Message edited by: editor ]
|
|
#66
06-01-2002, 20:33
|
|||
|
|||
Where do I start? I am here as myself. I am a police officer and a human being. These are my own personal views. I am not giving some official view. I am doing this in my own time because I want to. I think it is really important that I talk to all sorts of people from all backgrounds to make sure I have a more balanced view of life. I really want to try to move beyond all the hate and anger people feel although I understand people are expressing how they really feel. This board provides an important place where people can express themselves and I would like to express myself as well.
I have to say that I was not in charge of the policing of the march although I was there. These things are a very difficult call. It is about balancing rights. It is about balancing the rights of people who want to protest against the rights of others not to have their properties broken into and their belongings stolen. We can debate forever whether the police were justified or not. The last march in the summer was convened by the same people, involved many of the same people and followed the same route. The organisers refused to tell the Brixton Superintendent what route they planned to take as required by the law. Deja vue or reasonable cause to think their might be trouble again? Shop owners and many others in the community said the police should have known their was going to be trouble and the police should have prevented the looting. I think what the police did was within the law and reasonable. Others will disagree. I think there are many problems with the criminal justice system from start to finish. In general I think it does more good than harm and until we can think of a new system or changes to the existing one, I have to try to make it work the best it can for everyone. I am no lapdog of my political masters. I do not say the things I say here or elsewhere to impress anyone. I say what is on my heart and it often gets me into trouble, mainly with my bosses! I love people. I love Brixton. I want to do my best for everyone, particularly for those whose voices are not often heard. Two choices I guess. You either think this is some kind of propoganda or a genuine attempt to broaden my understanding. By the way, one of my tutors at Oxford said that whilst I was bright, he did not think I would do very well at exams as I had difficulty expressing myself on paper. So, sorry about the spelling and punctuation but I write like I speak. Never mind the gift wrapping, look at the content!!
|
|
#67
06-01-2002, 21:50
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Commander: if you are who you say you are (I'm afraid I have my serious doubts, such is the nature of the web), please mail me - from a Metropolitan Police email address - and I'm sure we could set up a proper interview here.
|
|
#68
06-01-2002, 23:01
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am an anarchist and therefore believe their are higher "rights" than property rights. I believe that the arbitrary division of the world into pieces that can be owned and withdrawn from use by another human being serves only those who managed to obtain the bits of land before laws and titles came into being.
I believe that if such things as universal rights exist (and this is something I'm still deciding on) that they include the right to not be killed or physically harmed because of the action or inaction by another human being. And the old "do as you will but harm none" which includes a right to act freely, responsible to your own conscience. As a policeman you do not have the freedom of your own conscience. The opposite - you are ordered to not just consider some set of laws as absolute for yourself, but to impose them on others. This is whether you personally agree with them or not. In fact your training is aimed at eradicating any thoughts that law might not be the absolute measure of what is right and wrong. I believe we can never have laws that represent what is absolutely right and wrong. Apart from the historical evidence showing how bad laws can be (slavery, rape not existing within marriage and millions more) there is the truism that every circumstance is different and therefore only the people present can know and judge what happened. At best laws are patched together to try and handle the complexity - for example differentiating out "battered wife syndrome" to recognise that self defence need not always be because of an immediate threat. As a software engineer I am familiar with systems where new situations are continuously handled with a quick hack - they fast turn into unmanageable unwieldy monsters forever at breaking point (MS Windows anybody?). The best thing to do is start again from scratch as they are the result of a bad initial design. At worst, and I would say usually, they are cobbled together by politicians scared of losing their jobs by doing anything other than cater to the current whims of the Sun. It reminds me of the NF's easy response to paedophiles (oh that thread again) which is string em all up, and as we discussed before is not at all helpful. But the politicians have no more choice than we as individuals do - they must play the system or be written out of the game because were they to try and recognise the true complexity of human interaction in their policies it would require intelligence, inhuman foresight and courage. I believe we can come together to form a better society that works better and does not impinge on human beings freedom to live in the way that our current mess of a system does. I believe in true communism - anarchy. Where all economic entities (factories, services) are run by the workers and users of the system. Where we are free from property crime. We are free to concentrate on what makes human beings better off and not what turns a profit. Where we seek to bring out the best in everyone, not assume the worst.
|
|
#69
07-01-2002, 00:10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top post Ginger !
"Commander" - you write convincingly! Maybe you could clear up this little matter of "whiskey" who writes less well, but from the same ISP! And if you really want some form of dialogue, then consider taking up the editors offer! Quote:
And I fully agree with Ginger: If you spend your life "going along with things", taking orders, (even if you find them distasteful) then you are a lapdog!You cannot be your own man within the system! Alex Olowade has discovered this to his cost! Quote:
And then you write: Quote:
So, could there be any point in continuing with a discussion I ask myself. I know this; I would never be a cop! And I will never believe that the Met is a benign organisation! I will never grow to respect it!
|
|
#70
12-01-2002, 09:54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Guys. Sorry it takes me a while to get back to you but I am very busy in the week! Anyway...
The concept of anarchism has always appealed to me. The idea of the innate goodness of the individual that is corrupted by society or the system. It is a theoretical argument but I am not sure everyone would behave well if there were no laws and no system. I believe there are many people forced into causing harm to others by the way society operates at the moment. They would not have to behave in this way if the current system did not exist or was radically different. What am I saying here? I am saying that the way society operates at the moment, with all the injustice and discrimination, pushes people to act against their nature to damage and harm others. Eradicate all injustice and discrimination - would that stop all people damaging and harming each other - I am not sure. If there were still people who would continue to exploit and harm others, how would you stop such injustice if you had no system, no society? ginger nuts there are certainly higher rights than property rights. The right to physical and spiritual well-being of the individual must be higher rights. Why should people have arbitrary rights over pieces of the world? Of course if you believe in the innate goodness of the individual, in the absence of 'the system' all would work to the good of everyone - each according to their ability and each according to their need. Have we not tried this? The problem is, if individuals are innately selfish, out for what is in it for them, they will only or primarily work for the good of themselves and not 'the whole'. "Do as you will but harm none" is the principle that I try to work to, within the constraints placed upon me. I have the freedom of my own conscience to the extent of the priorities I place on what I and my officers do. Does smoking small amounts of cannabis harm anyone else other than the smoker? I do not think so. Can I, as a police officer not enforce the law and get away with it. Probably not. So I introduce a pilot scheme where we do not arrest people for cannabis in Lambeth. I am looking at a new strap line for the police in Lambeth - and this is spooky because I thought of it before I read your latest post ginger nuts - "Don't damage my community". What does that mean? I guess you could translate it into "DO as you will but harm none." Is this dialogue influencing me or am I not miles away from the thinking of my fellow posters? Every circumstance is different and that is why police officers have discretion to enforce the law or not in a particular situation. It has advantages and disadvantages. It is open to getting much better resolutions and it is open to abuse. freethepeeps I think the Editor says Whisey is Colin (obviously a master of disguise!) I e-mailed Ed. from work yesterday. Ed. if you did not get it call me in the office! What good does the criminal justice system do? Well I guess it has the potential to enforce the "do as you will but harm none" ethos. If you do harm someone else, should there not be a sanction against that person. Now I am not saying that tradtional punishments like prison are the right or the most effective sanctions, but the criminal justice system has identified those who have unjustifiably harmed others and 'punished' them for that. Of course whether you are talking about philosophies or religions or legal systems, they are all the products of, or have been interfered with, by human beings (even if the Bible is the Word of God, it is interpreted by human beings, etc.) I think all human beings are fallible and whatever you are talking about, if there are humans involved, it is flawed. The criminal jusice system is flawed. I am trying to do the best I can in the job I do within the system that currently exists. I guess that puts me in the other camp to those who want to overthrow 'the system'. I do not treat all of anything as criminals - all protestors, all black people, all straight people (!) I try to treat each individual as an individual. Do not treat all police officers as lapdogs of a corrupt capitalist system. Dogs sometimes turn on their owners. They are notoriously unpredictable and they can end up working against the people that keep them! Kept dog is OK, I can live with that. Lapdog - in your dreams! I admire anyone who passionately believes in their cause and I will defend their right to promote that cause provided they "harm none".
|
|
#71
12-01-2002, 12:32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I've ignored ColinTheCop's posts, as he's clearly a twat, but this Commander guy is making the effort and for that we must be grateful.
He seems to have a proactive approach - regardless of whether he's a cop or not, and so I think we could give him the space to let him argue his point or it'll all get a bit one sided. And my own opinion of gun carrying in Brixton or anywhere else is simple - if you go out onto the streets armed, don't you dare come crying when you get shot. The nutter with a cigarette lighter that was shot dead? No pity whatsoever. Even if he was mentally ill. I'd rather the guy was laid out cold on a mortuary slab where he can do no harm than left to terrorise people and encourage others to go out in public with a gun, seemingly immune to the laws in this country.
|
|
#72
12-01-2002, 19:00
|
|||
|
|||
|
I fucking hate your board personality PK. I don't think you are as harsh in real life, but the stuff about Derek Bennett is really inhumane.
Yes, Derek Bennett, or anyone waving around what appeared to be a gun, on the streets of Brixton is asking for big trouble, and risks being shot dead. I know that. But the whole point is that it would have been better if he could have been stopped without being killed. (I have suggested methods for this elsewhere on these boards). There is also the issue of some Police appearing to (or in reality) be more trigger happy when it comes to black men. This also links to the disproportionate number of deaths of black men in Police custody. Derek Bennett may not have been a very plesant charater (I don't know) but that doesn't mean he should have ended up dead. He was also the cousin of a friend and neighbour of mine that I have a great deal of respect for. Perhaps you'd like to be introduced so you can say to his face how glad you are that his cousin is dead.  [ 12 January 2002: Message edited by: hatboy ] Last edited by hatboy; 28-11-2003 at 12:32.
|
|
#73
12-01-2002, 19:14
|
|||
|
|||
|
About The Commander - yeah the above is all good, but I beleive it's not him. A clever impersonation maybe.
Commander - will you please contact the editor (Mike) from a Metropolitan Police email address or offer some other conclusive proof of your authenticity. I have some stuff I want to talk to you about, but until we all know for sure that you are genuine I won't be reading yor posts. Thanks. One more thing. I am not as right-on in real life as some people might think I appear here, but I do beleive strongly in truth and natural justice. I also know a wide variety of people in Brixton and care strongly about the area.
|
|
#74
12-01-2002, 19:52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've absolutely no intention of wasting my time on the phone asI can't think of any reason why your mail shouldn't have come through, But to make it even easier for you, I've set up a special mailbox, just for you! Feel free to mail me at this address: MetPolice@urban75.com Anything coming from a non-Met Police address will be ignored or reposted here.
|
|
#75
14-01-2002, 13:07
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ho hum. Another day and *still* no email from the (ahem) 'Commander'.
Could it be because - surely not! - that he's nothing more than another sad alter ego of that pitiful loser, Colin the Cop? You decide!
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
