1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Research respondents needed from Brighton- nightlife/lapdance survey

Discussion in 'London and the South East' started by sushilover, Feb 25, 2012.

  1. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

    I'm now doing that thing I used to do in primary school, you know, when you shove your tongue in between your teeth and lip, not terribly constructive but you have backed my brain into a small tucked away dark place right at the back of my head.
    Maggot and spliff like this.
  2. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

    What happens if someone else not on the (new updated) list does the same thing?
  3. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    Er, ok...
  4. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    You mean someone who isn't on the list?
  5. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

    OH MY GOD! :facepalm:

    *RUNS AWAY, SCREAMING*
  6. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    I'm sorry I clearly didn't understand your far from clear question. If you explain what you were asking I can try again...?
  7. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    Or alternatively you could just tell me what the fuck your point is because I have no idee and I've stated many continuously.
  8. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

    You smell.
    telbert and gentlegreen like this.
  9. bi0boy

    bi0boy .

    How about those people who think they aren't posting spam but a great opportunity to make genuine product savings, should we specifically exclude that in the FAQ?

    What about those people who don't even read the FAQ that is displayed when signing up, as I suspect was the case with the OP, despite your best efforts to convince yourself otherwise.
  10. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    Nope of course I'm saying they should be excluded from the FAQ. I'm saying academic researchers should be included in the FAQ. They're not welcome so make it explicitly clear.
  11. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

  12. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    Yeah I really can't give a shit by this point in the conversation. Sigh.
  13. Corax

    Corax This will change your life: http://bit.ly/19lPFRa

    Any idea why she wants to ask people in Brighton about the Scottish lapdancing industry though nosos? It has me intrigued.
  14. bi0boy

    bi0boy .

    Did the OP actually read it anyway? I presume not or they would have noticed the bit about hanging around to get a feel of the place before posting.
  15. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    Yes. And given this thread I have absolutely no desire to reveal personal information her or about the project.
  16. bi0boy

    bi0boy .

    But she comes on here asking for our postcodes :confused:
  17. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    Speculating about what a new poster you all scared off did or didn't do has zero relevance to my suggestion about the slight change to the FAQ.
  18. bi0boy

    bi0boy .

    It does, because your suggestion is based on the premise that she read the FAQ but didn't understand it.
    lizzieloo likes this.
  19. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    My suggestion is that (a) urban75 doesn't want academic researchers posting requests for participants on their boards (b) the current FAQ does not explicitly say this (c) therefore it's addition would be helpful for the cohesion of the community.
  20. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    And I'm really fucking bored of this stupid tit-for-tat argument we have got sucked into. It's exactly the reason I stopped posting here in the first fucking place. I got pissed you were rude to my friend but let's agree to disagree about how justified that was. The suggestion in post above is meant in good faith. I do think this'll happen again unless you make the fact academics are excluded more explicit.
  21. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

  22. bi0boy

    bi0boy .

    See post 66
  23. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    yeah as i said that time, listing the one other group likely to turn up with surveys is not the same thing as having to list any possible scenario :rolleyes:
  24. bi0boy

    bi0boy .

  25. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

    It's obvious from the FAQs that wouldn't be welcome, only an idiot wouldn't be able to suss that out from what is already there.

    Did your mate read the FAQs?
  26. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    The FAQ doesn't include academic research in the list of things that aren't welcome - how therefore is it obvious that this isn't welcome?
  27. nosos

    nosos Well-Known Member

    Fwiw I teach students to ALWAYS approach the moderator of a site before posting a request. Not everyone has been taught this and not everyone is familiar with online culture.
  28. ddraig

    ddraig obstreperous eastside

  29. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

    It's obvious that lazy reasearch isn't welcome.

    By whoever, whatever job they do.

    *Loses the will to live*

    You HAVE to be on a wind up here.
  30. lizzieloo

    lizzieloo Up yer bum

    I'm starting to feel like I've had opiates.

Share This Page