Discussion in 'theory, philosophy & history' started by camouflage, Dec 13, 2011.
rigorous, intellectual and debate are not three words that spring to mind when looking at Philipa's contribution to this thread
That kids knows not how to throw a punch.
On and on and on, bitching and sniping far into the night like a gin-sodden old dowager...
Ah, I see this went well.
anything to avoid having to address the points in the posts, here and here eh phil
try and make as much noise and throw as much personal abuse about as you can and hope that this does enough to cause a distraction from your inability to actually address the points (and i don't know about you, but for me 5pm is not far into the night)
face it, you're simply not fit for purpose
still dodging the issues philip
would have thought had you had such a solid grasp of the topic you are trying to talk about then dealing with the issues raised in those posts would have been simple and taken up less time than it has taken you to generate the bluster that you do here (which is in no way in order to distract from your inability to do so, oh no)
No you nutter, I'm talking to you on the other thread--or I was when you posted this. How many conversations can you have at once?
you've had ample time to come up with a response and yet you are unable to - instead trying to create as much noise and distraction as you can to create cover for your own inabilities
not fit for purpose philip, far from it indeed
Separate names with a comma.